Universal Adversarial Suffixes for Language Models Using Reinforcement Learning with Calibrated Reward
On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking
Abstract (arXiv)
Language models are vulnerable to short adversarial suffixes that can reliably alter predictions. Previous works usually find such suffixes with gradient search or rule-based methods, but these are brittle and often tied to a single task or model. In this paper, a reinforcement learning framework is used where the suffix is treated as a policy and trained with Proximal Policy Optimization against a frozen model as a reward oracle. Rewards are shaped using calibrated cross-entropy, removing label bias and aggregating across surface forms to improve transferability. The proposed method is evaluated on five diverse NLP benchmark datasets, covering sentiment, natural language inference, paraphrase, and commonsense reasoning, using three distinct language models: Qwen2-1.5B Instruct, TinyLlama-1.1B Chat, and Phi-1.5. Results show that RL-trained suffixes consistently degrade accuracy and transfer more effectively across tasks and models than previous adversarial triggers of similar genres.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 14 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2025.
Builds on
14 of 18 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul
Other references · 12
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
- 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 568
- 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 256
- 2018Seq2Sick: Evaluating the Robustness of Sequence-to-Sequence Models with Adversarial Examplescited by 93
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Beyond Sparse Rewards: Enhancing Reinforcement Learning with Language Model Critique in Text Generation
- 2025RIVAL: Reinforcement Learning with Iterative and Adversarial Optimization for Machine Translation
- 2024Advancing Adversarial Suffix Transfer Learning on Aligned Large Language Models
- 2022Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization
- 2024Can Reinforcement Learning Unlock the Hidden Dangers in Aligned Large Language Models?
- 2023Language Model Alignment with Elastic Reset
- 2024Entropy-Regularized Token-Level Policy Optimization for Language Agent Reinforcement
- 2026Detecting Fluent Optimization-Based Adversarial Prompts via Sequential Entropy Changes