mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Improving the Sensitivity of Backdoor Detectors via Class Subspace Orthogonalization

arXiv 2512.08129 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2025cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most post-training backdoor detection methods rely on attacked models exhibiting extreme outlier detection statistics for the target class of an attack, compared to non-target classes. However, these approaches may fail: (1) when some (non-target) classes are easily discriminable from all others, in which case they may naturally achieve extreme detection statistics (e.g., decision confidence); and (2) when the backdoor is subtle, i.e., with its features weak relative to intrinsic class-discriminative features. A key observation is that the backdoor target class has contributions to its detection statistic from both the backdoor trigger and from its intrinsic features, whereas non-target classes only have contributions from their intrinsic features. To achieve more sensitive detectors, we thus propose to suppress intrinsic features while optimizing the detection statistic for a given class. For non-target classes, such suppression will drastically reduce the achievable statistic, whereas for the target class the (significant) contribution from the backdoor trigger remains. In practice, we formulate a constrained optimization problem, leveraging a small set of clean examples from a given class, and optimizing the detection statistic while orthogonalizing with respect to the class's intrinsic features. We dub this plug-and-play approach Class Subspace Orthogonalization (CSO) and assess it against challenging mixed-label and adaptive attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2025.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  6. 2018Fine-Pruning: Defending Against Backdooring Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 550
  7. 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 457
  8. 2020Reflection Backdoor: A Natural Backdoor Attack on Deep Neural Networkscited by 341
  9. 2020Input-Aware Dynamic Backdoor Attackcited by 304
  10. 2019Label-Consistent Backdoor Attackscited by 285
  11. 2019A new Backdoor Attack in CNNs by training set corruption without label poisoningcited by 237
  12. 2020Clean-Label Backdoor Attacks on Video Recognition Modelscited by 162
10 more
  1. 2022Backdoor Defense via Decoupling the Training Processcited by 149
  2. 2022Narcissus: A Practical Clean-Label Backdoor Attack with Limited Informationcited by 102
  3. 2021Sleeper Agent: Scalable Hidden Trigger Backdoors for Neural Networks Trained from Scratchcited by 98
  4. 2022BppAttack: Stealthy and Efficient Trojan Attacks against Deep Neural Networks via Image Quantization and Contrastive Adversarial Learningcited by 82
  5. 2019Bypassing Backdoor Detection Algorithms in Deep Learningcited by 69
  6. 2022MM-BD: Post-Training Detection of Backdoor Attacks with Arbitrary Backdoor Pattern Types Using a Maximum Margin Statisticcited by 53
  7. 2023UNICORN: A Unified Backdoor Trigger Inversion Frameworkcited by 44
  8. 2022Rethinking the Reverse-engineering of Trojan Triggerscited by 37
  9. 2024CLIBE: Detecting Dynamic Backdoors in Transformer-based NLP Modelscited by 11
  10. 2024CEPA: Consensus Embedded Perturbation for Agnostic Detection and Inversion of Backdoorscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.