mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

KIGNet: Physics-Motivated Multi-Graph Representation Learning for Explainable Jet Tagging

arXiv 2512.07420 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2025hep-ph cs.LG hep-excited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Jet identification plays a central role in analyzing data from high-energy collider experiments. While deep learning has improved jet classification, it often lacks interpretability. We introduce the Kinematic Interaction Graph Network (KIGNet), a graph neural network that integrates kinematic variables into jet classification by constructing four graph representations per jet, each weighted by a distinct variable: angular separation (Delta), relative transverse momentum (kT), momentum fraction (z), and invariant mass squared (m2). Three of these (Delta, kT, z) are motivated by the Lund jet plane, grounded in perturbative QCD factorization; the fourth (m2) adds complementary mass-scale sensitivity for heavy-flavor identification. Using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), we determine which variables dominate classification. Angular separation and relative transverse momentum account for about 76% of the total Grad-CAM attribution (40.72% and 35.67%), with momentum fraction and invariant mass contributing the remaining 24%. This hierarchy is consistent with the soft-collinear structure of QCD radiation in the training data, showing that the network learns physically interpretable representations rather than spurious correlations. On the JetClass dataset, KIGNet achieves a macro-accuracy of 95.07%, macro-AUC of 96.61%, and macro-AUPR of 81.52%, relative improvements of 2.45%, 3.40%, and 19.11% over the state-of-the-art baseline. On the Aspen Open Jets dataset of real CMS collision data, KIGNet produces substantially more structured latent representations than the baseline, reducing the Davies-Bouldin Index by 52.15% (0.8395 rightarrow 0.4017) and increasing the Dunn Index by 42.33% (0.0189 rightarrow 0.0269), confirming that physics-informed kinematic encoding generalizes beyond idealized simulation to experimental detector conditions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2025.

Builds on

20 of 54 references.

References · 20

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2018Dynamic Graph CNN for Learning on Point Cloudscited by 2,223
  3. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,089
  4. 2017Deep Setscited by 1,421
  5. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
  6. 2020Lorentz Group Equivariant Neural Network for Particle Physicscited by 121
  7. 2022Particle Transformer for Jet Taggingcited by 98
  8. 2018Energy Flow Networks: Deep Sets for Particle Jetscited by 84
  9. 2019ParticleNet: Jet Tagging via Particle Cloudscited by 64
  10. 2018Machine Learning in High Energy Physics Community White Papercited by 49
  11. 2015Jet-Images -- Deep Learning Editioncited by 41
  12. 2022PELICAN: Permutation Equivariant and Lorentz Invariant or Covariant Aggregator Network for Particle Physicscited by 26
8 more
  1. 2021Point Cloud Transformers applied to Collider Physicscited by 23
  2. 2017QCD-Aware Recursive Neural Networks for Jet Physicscited by 22
  3. 2020Jet tagging in the Lund plane with graph networkscited by 22
  4. 2024Aspen Open Jets: Unlocking LHC Data for Foundation Models in Particle Physicscited by 14
  5. 2021Particle Convolution for High Energy Physicscited by 8
  6. 2022Jet tagging algorithm of graph network with HaarPooling message passingcited by 3
  7. 2023PCN: A Deep Learning Approach to Jet Tagging Utilizing Novel Graph Construction Methods and Chebyshev Graph Convolutionscited by 3
  8. 2025Spatially Aware Linear Transformer (SAL-T) for Particle Jet Taggingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.