Reevaluating Automated Wildlife Species Detection: A Reproducibility Study on a Custom Image Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study revisits the findings of Carl et al., who evaluated the pre-trained Google Inception-ResNet-v2 model for automated detection of European wild mammal species in camera trap images. To assess the reproducibility and generalizability of their approach, we reimplemented the experiment from scratch using openly available resources and a different dataset consisting of 900 images spanning 90 species. After minimal preprocessing, we obtained an overall classification accuracy of 62%, closely aligning with the 71% reported in the original work despite differences in datasets. As in the original study, per-class performance varied substantially, as indicated by a macro F1 score of 0.28,highlighting limitations in generalization when labels do not align directly with ImageNet classes. Our results confirm that pretrained convolutional neural networks can provide a practical baseline for wildlife species identification but also reinforce the need for species-specific adaptation or transfer learning to achieve consistent, high-quality predictions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2025.
Builds on
3 of 12 references.
References · 3
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
Built on by
Not cited yet.