mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PARIS: Pruning Algorithm via the Representer theorem for Imbalanced Scenarios

arXiv 2512.06950 ↗First posted 7 Dec 2025stat.ML cs.LG physics.space-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The challenge of imbalanced regression arises when standard Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) biases models toward high-frequency regions of the data distribution, causing severe degradation on rare but high-impact ``tail'' events. Existing strategies uch as loss re-weighting or synthetic over-sampling often introduce noise, distort the underlying distribution, or add substantial algorithmic complexity. We introduce PARIS (Pruning Algorithm via the Representer theorem for Imbalanced Scenarios), a principled framework that mitigates imbalance by optimizing the training set itself. PARIS leverages the representer theorem for neural networks to compute a closed-form representer deletion residual, which quantifies the exact change in validation loss caused by removing a single training point without retraining. Combined with an efficient Cholesky rank-one downdating scheme, PARIS performs fast, iterative pruning that eliminates uninformative or performance-degrading samples. We use a real-world space weather example, where PARIS reduces the training set by up to 75% while preserving or improving overall RMSE, outperforming re-weighting, synthetic oversampling, and boosting baselines. Our results demonstrate that representer-guided dataset pruning is a powerful, interpretable, and computationally efficient approach to rare-event regression.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2025.

Builds on

14 of 32 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  3. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  4. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  5. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
  6. 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
  7. 2021Delving into Deep Imbalanced Regressioncited by 157
  8. 2022Training Data Influence Analysis and Estimation: A Surveycited by 134
  9. 2022Dataset Pruning: Reducing Training Data by Examining Generalization Influencecited by 132
  10. 2017Training Gaussian Mixture Models at Scale via Coresetscited by 38
  11. 2020Discriminative Jackknife: Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning via Higher-Order Influence Functionscited by 34
  12. 2023Theoretical and Practical Perspectives on what Influence Functions Docited by 28
2 more
  1. 2023Revisiting the Fragility of Influence Functionscited by 20
  2. 2024Quanda: An Interpretability Toolkit for Training Data Attribution Evaluation and Beyondcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.