Rethinking Robustness: A New Approach to Evaluating Feature Attribution Methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper studies the robustness of feature attribution methods for deep neural networks. It challenges the current notion of attributional robustness that largely ignores the difference in the model's outputs and introduces a new way of evaluating the robustness of attribution methods. Specifically, we propose a new definition of similar inputs, a new robustness metric, and a novel method based on generative adversarial networks to generate these inputs. In addition, we present a comprehensive evaluation with existing metrics and state-of-the-art attribution methods. Our findings highlight the need for a more objective metric that reveals the weaknesses of an attribution method rather than that of the neural network, thus providing a more accurate evaluation of the robustness of attribution methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2025.
Builds on
25 of 38 references.
References · 25
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
13 more
- 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2016Not Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 297
- 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 216
- 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 188
- 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
- 2022Rethinking Stability for Attribution-based Explanationscited by 52
- 2020Evaluations and Methods for Explanation through Robustness Analysiscited by 51
- 2019Robust Attribution Regularizationcited by 47
- 2020How Good is your Explanation? Algorithmic Stability Measures to Assess the Quality of Explanations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2023Red Teaming Deep Neural Networks with Feature Synthesis Toolscited by 21
- 2023From Robustness to Explainability and Back Againcited by 14
- 2020Enhanced Regularizers for Attributional Robustnesscited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.