Learning to Hedge Swaptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates the deep hedging framework, based on reinforcement learning (RL), for the dynamic hedging of swaptions, contrasting its performance with traditional sensitivity-based rho-hedging. We design agents under three distinct objective functions (mean squared error, downside risk, and Conditional Value-at-Risk) to capture alternative risk preferences and evaluate how these objectives shape hedging styles. Relying on a three-factor arbitrage-free dynamic Nelson-Siegel model for our simulation experiments, our findings show that near-optimal hedging effectiveness is achieved when using two swaps as hedging instruments. Deep hedging strategies dynamically adapt the hedging portfolio's exposure to risk factors across states of the market. In our experiments, their out-performance over rho-hedging strategies persists even in the presence some of model misspecification. These results highlight RL's potential to deliver more efficient and resilient swaption hedging strategies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Dec 2025.
Builds on
8 of 36 references.
References · 8
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2024KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 634
- 2024Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks are Radial Basis Function Networkscited by 125
- 2018Deep Hedgingcited by 106
- 2021Deep Hedging of Derivatives Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 30
- 2024Enhancing Deep Hedging of Options with Implied Volatility Surface Feedback Informationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.