mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

When Privacy Isn't Synthetic: Hidden Data Leakage in Generative AI Models

arXiv 2512.06062 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative models are increasingly used to produce privacy-preserving synthetic data as a safe alternative to sharing sensitive training datasets. However, we demonstrate that such synthetic releases can still leak information about the underlying training samples through structural overlap in the data manifold. We propose a black-box membership inference attack that exploits this vulnerability without requiring access to model internals or real data. The attacker repeatedly queries the generative model to obtain large numbers of synthetic samples, performs unsupervised clustering to identify dense regions of the synthetic distribution, and then analyzes cluster medoids and neighborhoods that correspond to high-density regions in the original training data. These neighborhoods act as proxies for training samples, enabling the adversary to infer membership or reconstruct approximate records. Our experiments across healthcare, finance, and other sensitive domains show that cluster overlap between real and synthetic data leads to measurable membership leakage-even when the generator is trained with differential privacy or other noise mechanisms. The results highlight an under-explored attack surface in synthetic data generation pipelines and call for stronger privacy guarantees that account for distributional neighborhood inference rather than sample-level memorization alone, underscoring its role in privacy-preserving data publishing. Implementation and evaluation code are publicly available at:github.com/Cluster-Medoid-Leakage-Attack.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2025.

Builds on

13 of 44 references.

References · 13

  1. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  2. 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 864
  3. 2019Modeling Tabular data using Conditional GANcited by 699
  4. 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
  5. 2022Diffusion Art or Digital Forgery? Investigating Data Replication in Diffusion Modelscited by 424
  6. 2022TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data with Diffusion Modelscited by 377
  7. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 346
  8. 2022Language Models are Realistic Tabular Data Generatorscited by 294
  9. 2019White-box vs Black-box: Bayes Optimal Strategies for Membership Inferencecited by 271
  10. 2018Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 185
  11. 2019Reconstruction and Membership Inference Attacks against Generative Modelscited by 122
  12. 2023Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing in Agriculture: Enforcing Policy Rules for Secure and Confidential Data Synthesiscited by 5
1 more
  1. 2024KiNETGAN: Enabling Distributed Network Intrusion Detection through Knowledge-Infused Synthetic Data Generationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Privacy Auditing Synthetic Data Release through Local Likelihood Attacks
  2. 2022Privacy-preserving Generative Framework Against Membership Inference Attacks
  3. 2025Ensembling Membership Inference Attacks Against Tabular Generative Models
  4. 2023Membership Inference Attacks against Synthetic Data through Overfitting Detection
  5. 2025The Canary's Echo: Auditing Privacy Risks of LLM-Generated Synthetic Text
  6. 2026Phantoms and Disclosures: A Statistical Framework for Auditing Privacy in Synthetic Data
  7. 2025Understanding the Impact of Data Domain Extraction on Synthetic Data Privacy
  8. 2025Synth-MIA: A Testbed for Auditing Privacy Leakage in Tabular Data Synthesis