mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Optimal Watermark Generation under Type I and Type II Errors

arXiv 2512.05333 ↗First posted 5 Dec 2025stat.MEcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Watermarking has recently emerged as a crucial tool for protecting the intellectual property of generative models and for distinguishing AI-generated content from human-generated data. Despite its practical success, most existing watermarking schemes are empirically driven and lack a theoretical understanding of the fundamental trade-off between detection power and generation fidelity. To address this gap, we formulate watermarking as a statistical hypothesis testing problem between a null distribution and its watermarked counterpart. Under explicit constraints on false-positive and false-negative rates, we derive a tight lower bound on the achievable fidelity loss, measured by a general f-divergence, and characterize the optimal watermarked distribution that attains this bound. We further develop a corresponding sampling rule that provides an optimal mechanism for inserting watermarks with minimal fidelity distortion. Our result establishes a simple yet broadly applicable principle linking hypothesis testing, information divergence, and watermark generation.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Dec 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.