MASE: Interpretable NLP Models via Model-Agnostic Saliency Estimation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have made significant strides in Natural Language Processing (NLP), yet their interpretability remains elusive, particularly when evaluating their intricate decision-making processes. Traditional methods often rely on post-hoc interpretations, such as saliency maps or feature visualization, which might not be directly applicable to the discrete nature of word data in NLP. Addressing this, we introduce the Model-agnostic Saliency Estimation (MASE) framework. MASE offers local explanations for text-based predictive models without necessitating in-depth knowledge of a model's internal architecture. By leveraging Normalized Linear Gaussian Perturbations (NLGP) on the embedding layer instead of raw word inputs, MASE efficiently estimates input saliency. Our results indicate MASE's superiority over other model-agnostic interpretation methods, especially in terms of Delta Accuracy, positioning it as a promising tool for elucidating the operations of text-based models in NLP.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2025.
Builds on
25 of 47 references.
References · 25
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 721
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
13 more
- 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
- 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 254
- 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 250
- 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 216
- 2015Visualizing and Understanding Neural Models in NLPcited by 200
- 2018L-Shapley and C-Shapley: Efficient Model Interpretation for Structured Datacited by 100
- 2017Comparative Study of CNN and RNN for Natural Language Processingcited by 82
- 2024Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 77
- 2015Supersparse Linear Integer Models for Optimized Medical Scoring Systemscited by 76
- 2019An Evaluation of the Human-Interpretability of Explanationcited by 71
- 2018Towards Explanation of DNN-based Prediction with Guided Feature Inversioncited by 31
- 2016Interpretation of Prediction Models Using the Input Gradientcited by 24
- 2018Spatial-temporal Multi-Task Learning for Within-field Cotton Yield Predictioncited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.