mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Efficient Public Verification of Private ML via Regularization

arXiv 2512.04008 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training with differential privacy (DP) guarantees dataset members that they cannot be identified by users of the released model. However, those data providers, and, in general, the public, lack methods to efficiently verify that models trained on their data satisfy DP guarantees. The amount of compute needed to verify DP guarantees for current algorithms scales with the amount of computation required to train the model. In this paper we design the first DP algorithm with near optimal privacy-utility trade-offs but whose DP guarantees can be verified cheaper than training. We focus on DP stochastic convex optimization (DP-SCO), where optimal privacy-utility trade-offs are known. Here we show we can obtain tight privacy-utility trade-offs by privately minimizing a series of regularized objectives and only using the standard DP composition bound. Crucially, this method can be verified with much less compute than training. This leads to the first known DP-SCO algorithm with near optimal privacy-utility whose DP verification scales better than training cost, significantly reducing verification costs on large datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2025.

Builds on

28 of 46 references.

References · 28

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  2. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,221
  3. 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
  4. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  5. 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 512
  6. 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 447
  7. 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 303
  8. 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 213
  9. 2021Adversary Instantiation: Lower Bounds for Differentially Private Machine Learningcited by 193
  10. 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 183
  11. 2021Adaptive Machine Unlearningcited by 164
  12. 2021On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearningcited by 164
16 more
  1. 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 152
  2. 2020Machine Unlearning for Random Forestscited by 125
  3. 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 119
  4. 2021Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential Privacycited by 104
  5. 2021Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in ℓ1 Geometrycited by 83
  6. 2018Private Selection from Private Candidatescited by 75
  7. 2017Sub-sampled Cubic Regularization for Non-convex Optimizationcited by 63
  8. 2018How To Make the Gradients Small Stochastically: Even Faster Convex and Nonconvex SGDcited by 55
  9. 2022Planting Undetectable Backdoors in Machine Learning Modelscited by 55
  10. 2024Langevin Unlearning: A New Perspective of Noisy Gradient Descent for Machine Unlearningcited by 48
  11. 2019The Complexity of Making the Gradient Small in Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 33
  12. 2022Verifiable and Provably Secure Machine Unlearningcited by 24
  13. 2023ReSQueing Parallel and Private Stochastic Convex Optimizationcited by 17
  14. 2018Property Testing for Differential Privacycited by 16
  15. 2023Gradients Look Alike: Sensitivity is Often Overestimated in DP-SGDcited by 11
  16. 2025The Sample Complexity of Membership Inference and Privacy Auditingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.