mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Ultra-Strong Gradient Diffusion MRI with Self-Supervised Learning for Prostate Cancer Characterization

arXiv 2512.03196 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2025eess.IV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) enables non-invasive assessment of prostate microstructure but conventional dMRI metrics such as the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in multiparametric MRI and reflect a mixture of underlying tissues features rather than distinct histologic characteristics. Integrating dMRI with the compartment-based biophysical VERDICT (Vascular, Extracellular, and Restricted Diffusion for Cytometry in Tumours) framework offers richer microstructural insights, though clinical gradient systems (40-80 mT/m) often suffer from poor signal-to-noise ratio at stronger diffusion weightings due to prolonged echo times. Ultra-strong gradients (e.g., 300 mT/m) can mitigate these limitations by improving SNR and contrast-to-noise ratios. This study investigates whether physics-informed self-supervised VERDICT (ssVERDICT) fitting when combined with ultra-strong gradient data, enhances prostate microstructural characterization relative to current fitting approaches and clinical gradient systems. We developed enhanced ssVERDICT fitting approaches using dense multilayer perceptron and convolutional U-Net architectures, comparing them against non-linear least-squares (NLLS) VERDICT fitting, original ssVERDICT implementation, and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging across clinical- to ultra-strong gradient systems. For the same ultra-strong gradient data, Dense ssVERDICT outperformed NLLS VERDICT, boosting median CNR by 47%, cutting inter-patient Coefficient of Variation by 52%, and reducing pooled fic variation by 50%. Overall, Dense ssVERDICT delivered the highest CNR, the most stable parameter estimates, and the clearest tumour-normal contrast compared with conventional fitting methods and clinical gradient systems. These findings underscore that meaningful gains in non-invasive prostate cancer characterization arise from the combination of advanced gradient systems and deep learning-based modelling.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2025.

Builds on

7 of 42 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2022A microstructure estimation Transformer inspired by sparse representation for diffusion MRIcited by 14
  3. 2018Complex diffusion-weighted image estimation via matrix recovery under general noise modelscited by 8
  4. 2022Choice of training label matters: how to best use deep learning for quantitative MRI parameter estimationcited by 8
  5. 2023ssVERDICT: Self-Supervised VERDICT-MRI for Enhanced Prostate Tumour Characterisationcited by 4
  6. 2025Implicit neural representations for accurate estimation of the standard model of white mattercited by 2
  7. 2024MRI Parameter Mapping via Gaussian Mixture VAE: Breaking the Assumption of Independent Pixelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.