mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Performance Analysis of Quantum Support Vector Classifiers and Quantum Neural Networks

arXiv 2512.03094 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2025quant-ph cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study explores the performance of Quantum Support Vector Classifiers (QSVCs) and Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) in comparison to classical models for machine learning tasks. By evaluating these models on the Iris and MNIST-PCA datasets, we find that quantum models tend to outperform classical approaches as the problem complexity increases. While QSVCs generally provide more consistent results, QNNs exhibit superior performance in higher-complexity tasks due to their increased quantum load. Additionally, we analyze the impact of hyperparameter tuning, showing that feature maps and ansatz configurations significantly influence model accuracy. We also compare the PennyLane and Qiskit frameworks, concluding that Qiskit provides better optimization and efficiency for our implementation. These findings highlight the potential of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) for complex classification problems and provide insights into model selection and optimization strategies

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.

Builds on

2 of 8 references.

References · 2

  1. 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 660
  2. 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 85

Built on by

Not cited yet.