mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AuditCopilot: Leveraging LLMs for Fraud Detection in Double-Entry Bookkeeping

arXiv 2512.02726 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Auditors rely on Journal Entry Tests (JETs) to detect anomalies in tax-related ledger records, but rule-based methods generate overwhelming false positives and struggle with subtle irregularities. We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can serve as anomaly detectors in double-entry bookkeeping. Benchmarking SoTA LLMs such as LLaMA and Gemma on both synthetic and real-world anonymized ledgers, we compare them against JETs and machine learning baselines. Our results show that LLMs consistently outperform traditional rule-based JETs and classical ML baselines, while also providing natural-language explanations that enhance interpretability. These results highlight the potential of AI-augmented auditing, where human auditors collaborate with foundation models to strengthen financial integrity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2025.

Builds on

4 of 13 references.

References · 4

  1. 2024AD-LLM: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Anomaly Detectioncited by 26
  2. 2024AuditLLM: A Tool for Auditing Large Language Models Using Multiprobe Approachcited by 11
  3. 2024LLMAuditor: A Framework for Auditing Large Language Models Using Human-in-the-Loopcited by 8
  4. 2025Automating Financial Statement Audits with Large Language Modelscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.