mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Inverse Optimality for Fair Digital Twins: A Preference-based approach

arXiv 2512.01650 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.SE math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Digital Twins (DTs) are increasingly used as autonomous decision-makers in complex socio-technical systems. However, their mathematically optimal decisions often diverge from human expectations, revealing a persistent mismatch between algorithmic and bounded human rationality. This work addresses this challenge by proposing a framework that introduces fairness as a learnable objective within optimization-based Digital Twins. In this respect, a preference-driven learning workflow that infers latent fairness objectives directly from human pairwise preferences over feasible decisions is introduced. A dedicated Siamese neural network is developed to generate convex quadratic cost functions conditioned on contextual information. The resulting surrogate objectives drive the optimization procedure toward solutions that better reflect human-perceived fairness while maintaining computational efficiency. The effectiveness of the approach is demonstrated on a COVID-19 hospital resource allocation scenario. Overall, this work offers a practical solution to integrate human-centered fairness into the design of autonomous decision-making systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.

Builds on

9 of 23 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,871
  2. 2024Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization in Direct Alignment Algorithmscited by 142
  3. 2020Learning Convex Optimization Modelscited by 16
  4. 2022GLISp-r: A preference-based optimization algorithm with convergence guaranteescited by 3
  5. 2014Formulation, existence, and computation of boundedly rational dynamic user equilibrium with fixed or endogenous user tolerancecited by 2
  6. 2024From Efficiency to Equity: Measuring Fairness in Preference Learningcited by 2
  7. 2022Learning Critical Scenarios in Feedback Control Systems for Automated Drivingcited by 1
  8. 2025Optimal Placement of Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Challengescited by 1
  9. 2025The epistemic dimension of algorithmic fairness: assessing its impact in innovation diffusion and fair policy makingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.