Learning Reduced Representations for Quantum Classifiers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data sets that are specified by a large number of features are currently outside the area of applicability for quantum machine learning algorithms. An immediate solution to this impasse is the application of dimensionality reduction methods before passing the data to the quantum algorithm. We investigate six conventional feature extraction algorithms and five autoencoder-based dimensionality reduction models to a particle physics data set with 67 features. The reduced representations generated by these models are then used to train a quantum support vector machine for solving a binary classification problem: whether a Higgs boson is produced in proton collisions at the LHC. We show that the autoencoder methods learn a better lower-dimensional representation of the data, with the method we design, the Sinkclass autoencoder, performing 40% better than the baseline. The methods developed here open up the applicability of quantum machine learning to a larger array of data sets. Moreover, we provide a recipe for effective dimensionality reduction in this context.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.
Builds on
17 of 64 references.
References · 17
- 2018Supervised learning with quantum enhanced feature spacescited by 654
- 2020Power of data in quantum machine learningcited by 336
- 2019Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning modelscited by 330
- 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 325
- 2020A rigorous and robust quantum speed-up in supervised machine learningcited by 270
- 2021Supervised quantum machine learning models are kernel methodscited by 199
- 2021Quantum advantage in learning from experimentscited by 186
- 2024Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computingcited by 130
- 2024Better than classical? The subtle art of benchmarking quantum machine learning modelscited by 82
- 2023Manifold learning: what, how, and whycited by 66
- 2019Dirichlet Variational Autoencodercited by 43
- 2023Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection in Particle Physicscited by 29
5 more
- 2023Exponential separations between classical and quantum learnerscited by 21
- 2021Higgs analysis with quantum classifierscited by 14
- 2022Automatic and effective discovery of quantum kernelscited by 10
- 2023Unravelling physics beyond the standard model with classical and quantum anomaly detectioncited by 9
- 2022AutoQML: Automatic Generation and Training of Robust Quantum-Inspired Classifiers by Using Genetic Algorithms on Grayscale Imagescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.