mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Intrinsic Structure as a Proxy for Saliency: SVD-Based Weight Preservation for Mixed-Precision Quantization in Large Language Models

arXiv 2512.01343 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to scale in parameter count, deploying them on commodity hardware has become increasingly challenging. Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) addresses this by reducing the precision of model weights, typically to 4-bit or lower. However, uniform quantization often leads to significant performance degradation due to the presence of ``outlier features'' -- weights that, while few in number, are critical for maintaining model accuracy. Current state-of-the-art methods such as AWQ (Activation-aware Weight Quantization) and SpQR (Sparse Quantization Representations) rely on calibration data to identify these salient weights via activation magnitudes or Hessian sensitivity. In scenarios where data privacy is paramount or calibration data is unavailable, these methods are inapplicable. In this work, we propose a data-free, structure-aware hypothesis: that the weights identified as Principal Components via Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) are intrinsically important to the model's downstream performance. We introduce a novel selection heuristic that preserves the top-k weights aligned with the principal components in FP32, while aggressively quantizing the residual weights. We compare our method against activation-aware (AWQ) and second-order (SpQR) methods across GLUE benchmarks (MRPC, RTE, QNLI) using a DistilBERT backbone. Our experiments reveal that structural importance is highly correlated with functional importance. On the challenging RTE task, our SVD-based method achieves an accuracy of 66.06%, outperforming both AWQ (65.34%) and SpQR (65.34%) at high protection budgets, validating that intrinsic matrix structure can serve as a robust proxy for weight saliency without the need for forward passes or calibration data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.

Builds on

5 of 12 references.

References · 5

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2022GPTQ: Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Generative Pre-trained Transformerscited by 1,919
  3. 2022SmoothQuant: Accurate and Efficient Post-Training Quantization for Large Language Modelscited by 1,386
  4. 2022LLM.int8(): 8-bit Matrix Multiplication for Transformers at Scalecited by 906
  5. 2023SpQR: A Sparse-Quantized Representation for Near-Lossless LLM Weight Compressioncited by 367

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Identifying Sensitive Weights via Post-quantization Integral
  2. 2025SINQ: Sinkhorn-Normalized Quantization for Calibration-Free Low-Precision LLM Weights
  3. 2026D2Quant: Accurate Low-bit Post-Training Weight Quantization for LLMs
  4. 2024ResQ: Mixed-Precision Quantization of Large Language Models with Low-Rank Residuals
  5. 2023Norm Tweaking: High-performance Low-bit Quantization of Large Language Models
  6. 2026C-PTQ: Fisher-weighted Channel-wise Sensitivity for Post-training Quantization of MLLMs
  7. 2025PTQ1.61: Push the Real Limit of Extremely Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization Methods for Large Language Models
  8. 2026Saliency-Aware Regularized Quantization Calibration for Large Language Models