mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TempPerturb-Eval: On the Joint Effects of Internal Temperature and External Perturbations in RAG Robustness

arXiv 2512.01183 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

The evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems typically examines retrieval quality and generation parameters like temperature in isolation, overlooking their interaction. This work presents a systematic investigation of how text perturbations (simulating noisy retrieval) interact with temperature settings across multiple LLM runs. We propose a comprehensive RAG Perturbation-Temperature Analysis Framework that subjects retrieved documents to three distinct perturbation types across varying temperature settings. Through extensive experiments on HotpotQA with both open-source and proprietary LLMs, we demonstrate that performance degradation follows distinct patterns: high-temperature settings consistently amplify vulnerability to perturbations, while certain perturbation types exhibit non-linear sensitivity across the temperature range. Our work yields three key contributions: (1) a diagnostic benchmark for assessing RAG robustness, (2) an analytical framework for quantifying perturbation-temperature interactions, and (3) practical guidelines for model selection and parameter tuning under noisy retrieval conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 17 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2025.

Builds on

17 of 26 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Enhancing Noise Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models with Adaptive Adversarial Training31 May

Other references · 16

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  5. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  6. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,384
  7. 2024The Effect of Sampling Temperature on Problem Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 168
  8. 2022PRADA: Practical Black-Box Adversarial Attacks against Neural Ranking Modelscited by 44
  9. 2025Exploring the Impact of Temperature on Large Language Models:Hot or Cold?cited by 40
  10. 2025Optimizing Temperature for Language Models with Multi-Sample Inferencecited by 33
  11. 2020One word at a time: adversarial attacks on retrieval modelscited by 23
  12. 2023Natural Example-Based Explainability: a Surveycited by 13
4 more
  1. 2024RAGE Against the Machine: Retrieval-Augmented LLM Explanationscited by 8
  2. 2020Ranking-Incentivized Quality Preserving Content Modificationcited by 5
  3. 2023Can GPT models Follow Human Summarization Guidelines? A Study for Targeted Communication Goalscited by 4
  4. 2023CREDENCE: Counterfactual Explanations for Document Rankingcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024RAGGED: Towards Informed Design of Scalable and Stable RAG Systems
  2. 2025Evaluating the Retrieval Robustness of Large Language Models
  3. 2026A Systems-Level Analysis of Sensitivity, Robustness, and Stability in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  4. 2026How You Ask Matters! Adaptive RAG Robustness to Query Variations
  5. 2024Typos that Broke the RAG's Back: Genetic Attack on RAG Pipeline by Simulating Documents in the Wild via Low-level Perturbations
  6. 2025RARE: Retrieval-Aware Robustness Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
  7. 2026Retrieved But Not Reliable: A Survey on Attacks, and Defenses in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  8. 2025Worse than Zero-shot? A Fact-Checking Dataset for Evaluating the Robustness of RAG Against Misleading Retrievals