mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FairMT: Fairness for Heterogeneous Multi-Task Learning

arXiv 2512.00469 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness in machine learning has been extensively studied in single-task settings, while fair multi-task learning (MTL), especially with heterogeneous tasks (classification, detection, regression) and partially missing labels, remains largely unexplored. Existing fairness methods are predominantly classification-oriented and fail to extend to continuous outputs, making a unified fairness objective difficult to formulate. Further, existing MTL optimization is structurally misaligned with fairness: constraining only the shared representation, allowing task heads to absorb bias and leading to uncontrolled task-specific disparities. Finally, most work treats fairness as a zero-sum trade-off with utility, enforcing symmetric constraints that achieve parity by degrading well-served groups. We introduce FairMT, a unified fairness-aware MTL framework that accommodates all three task types under incomplete supervision. At its core is an Asymmetric Heterogeneous Fairness Constraint Aggregation mechanism, which consolidates task-dependent asymmetric violations into a unified fairness constraint. Utility and fairness are jointly optimized via a primal--dual formulation, while a head-aware multi-objective optimization proxy provides a tractable descent geometry that explicitly accounts for head-induced anisotropy. Across three homogeneous and heterogeneous MTL benchmarks encompassing diverse modalities and supervision regimes, FairMT consistently achieves substantial fairness gains while maintaining superior task utility. Code will be released upon paper acceptance.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2025.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  4. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  5. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
  6. 2018Multi-Task Learning as Multi-Objective Optimizationcited by 821
  7. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  8. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  9. 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 492
  10. 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
  11. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  12. 2019Pareto Multi-Task Learningcited by 224
8 more
  1. 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
  2. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 148
  3. 2020Fairness Metrics: A Comparative Analysiscited by 45
  4. 2024Utility-Fairness Trade-Offs and How to Find Themcited by 15
  5. 2022Attainability and Optimality: The Equalized Odds Fairness Revisitedcited by 10
  6. 2022Software Fairness: An Analysis and Surveycited by 8
  7. 2024Intrinsic Fairness-Accuracy Tradeoffs under Equalized Oddscited by 7
  8. 2023Mean Parity Fair Regression in RKHScited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.