mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stochastic Dominance Constrained Optimization with S-shaped Utilities: Poor-Performance-Region Algorithm and Neural Network

arXiv 2512.00299 ↗First posted 29 Nov 2025q-fin.MF cs.LG q-fin.PMcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the static portfolio selection problem of S-shaped and non-concave utility maximization under first-order and second-order stochastic dominance (SD) constraints. In many S-shaped utility optimization problems, one should require a liquidation boundary to guarantee the existence of a finite concave envelope function. A first-order SD (FSD) constraint can replace this requirement and provide an alternative for risk management. We explicitly solve the optimal solution under a general S-shaped utility function with a first-order stochastic dominance constraint. However, the second-order SD (SSD) constrained problem under non-concave utilities is difficult to solve analytically due to the invalidity of Sion's maxmin theorem. For this sake, we propose a numerical algorithm to obtain a plausible and sub-optimal solution for general non-concave utilities. The key idea is to detect the poor performance region with respect to the SSD constraints, characterize its structure and modify the distribution on that region to obtain (sub-)optimality. A key financial insight is that the decision maker should follow the SD constraint on the poor performance scenario while conducting the unconstrained optimal strategy otherwise. We provide numerical experiments to show that our algorithm effectively finds a sub-optimal solution in many cases. Finally, we develop an algorithm-guided piecewise-neural-network framework to learn the solution of the SSD problem, which demonstrates accelerated convergence compared to standard neural network approaches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2025.

Builds on

2 of 44 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Optimizing distortion riskmetrics with distributional uncertaintycited by 1
  2. 2021A Framework of State-dependent Utility Optimization with General Benchmarkscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.