MAS-Shield: A Defense Framework for Secure and Efficient LLM MAS
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Model (LLM)-based Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are susceptible to linguistic attacks that can trigger cascading failures across the network. Existing defenses face a fundamental dilemma: lightweight single-auditor methods are prone to single points of failure, while robust committee-based approaches incur prohibitive computational costs in multi-turn interactions. To address this challenge, we propose MAS-Shield, a secure and efficient defense framework designed with a coarse-to-fine filtering pipeline. Rather than applying uniform scrutiny, MAS-Shield dynamically allocates defense resources through a three-stage protocol: (1) Critical Agent Selection strategically targets high-influence nodes to narrow the defense surface; (2) Light Auditing employs lightweight sentry models to rapidly filter the majority of benign cases; and (3) Global Consensus Auditing escalates only suspicious or ambiguous signals to a heavyweight committee for definitive arbitration. This hierarchical design effectively optimizes the security-efficiency trade-off. Experiments demonstrate that MAS-Shield achieves a 92.5% recovery rate against diverse adversarial scenarios and reduces defense latency by over 70% compared to existing methods.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2025.
Builds on
21 of 37 references.
References · 21
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,203
- 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,793
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
- 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
- 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
- 2023Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisioncited by 445
- 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 372
- 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 351
- 2024Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations for LLM Conversation Safety: A Surveycited by 124
9 more
- 2025Red-Teaming LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Communication Attackscited by 118
- 2024On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agentscited by 92
- 2024PsySafe: A Comprehensive Framework for Psychological-based Attack, Defense, and Evaluation of Multi-agent System Safetycited by 79
- 2024Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Surveycited by 56
- 2024MACM: Utilizing a Multi-Agent System for Condition Mining in Solving Complex Mathematical Problemscited by 41
- 2024Can Large Language Models be Trusted for Evaluation? Scalable Meta-Evaluation of LLMs as Evaluators via Agent Debatecited by 40
- 2025MAM: Modular Multi-Agent Framework for Multi-Modal Medical Diagnosis via Role-Specialized Collaborationcited by 39
- 2024Protecting Your LLMs with Information Bottleneckcited by 26
- 2025Secure Multi-LLM Agentic AI and Agentification for Edge General Intelligence by Zero-Trust: A Surveycited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.