mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Switching-time bioprocess control with pulse-width-modulated optogenetics

arXiv 2511.22893 ↗First posted 28 Nov 2025eess.SY cs.AI cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Biotechnology can benefit from dynamic control to improve production efficiency. In this context, optogenetics enables modulation of gene expression using light as an external input, allowing fine-tuning of protein levels to unlock dynamic metabolic control and regulation of cell growth. Optogenetic systems can be actuated by light intensity. However, relying solely on intensity-driven control (i.e., signal amplitude) may fail to properly tune optogenetic bioprocesses when the dose-response relationship (i.e., light intensity versus gene-expression strength) is steep. In these cases, tunability is effectively constrained to either fully active or fully repressed gene expression, with little intermediate regulation. Pulse-width modulation can alleviate this issue by alternating between fully ON and OFF light intensity within forcing periods, thereby smoothing the average response and enhancing process controllability. Optimizing pulse-width-modulated optogenetics entails a switching-time optimal control problem with a binary input over multiple forcing periods. While this can be formulated as a mixed-integer optimization problem on a refined control grid with monotonic input constraints, the number of decision variables can grow rapidly with increasing control-grid resolution within forcing periods and with the total number of forcing periods, complicating the task. Here, we propose an alternative solution based on reinforcement learning. We parametrize control actions via the duty cycle, a continuous proxy variable that encodes the ON-to-OFF switching time within each forcing period, thereby respecting the intrinsic binary nature of the light intensity while avoiding fine-grid binary decision variables.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Nov 2025.

Builds on

3 of 11 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2025Reinforcement learning for efficient and robust multi-setpoint and multi-trajectory tracking in bioprocessescited by 4
  3. 2025Reinforcement learning for robust dynamic metabolic controlcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reinforcement learning meets bioprocess control through behaviour cloning: Real-world deployment in an industrial photobioreactor
  2. 2026Activation Steering Transfer to Agents: One Gain Ratio Does Not Identify Potency and Efficacy
  3. 2026From Learning to Control: Data-Driven Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Multivariable Control in a Microalgae Bioprocess ↗
  4. 2025AI-driven control of bioelectric signalling for real-time topological reorganization of cells
  5. 2026Sequential Design of Genetic Circuits Under Uncertainty With Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2023Identifying Dynamic Regulation with Adversarial Surrogates ↗
  7. 2026Implementation of reinforcement learning in chemical reaction networks: application to phototaxis as curiosity-driven exploration
  8. 2025Regulatory DNA sequence Design with Reinforcement Learning