Bridging the Modality Gap by Similarity Standardization with Pseudo-Positive Samples
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM training and visual instruction tuning
Abstract (arXiv)
Advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have enabled effective cross-modality retrieval. However, when both text and images exist in the database, similarity scores would differ in scale by modality. This phenomenon, known as the modality gap, hinders accurate retrieval. Most existing studies address this issue with manually labeled data, e.g., by fine-tuning VLMs on them. In this work, we propose a similarity standardization approach with pseudo data construction. We first compute the mean and variance of the similarity scores between each query and its paired data in text or image modality. Using these modality-specific statistics, we standardize all similarity scores to compare on a common scale across modalities. These statistics are calculated from pseudo pairs, which are constructed by retrieving the text and image candidates with the highest cosine similarity to each query. We evaluate our method across seven VLMs using two multi-modal QA benchmarks (MMQA and WebQA), where each question requires retrieving either text or image data. Our experimental results show that our method significantly improves retrieval performance, achieving average Recall@20 gains of 64% on MMQA and 28% on WebQA when the query and the target data belong to different modalities. Compared to E5-V, which addresses the modality gap through image captioning, we confirm that our method more effectively bridges the modality gap.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM training and visual instruction tuning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Nov 2025.
Builds on
13 of 21 references.
References · 13
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
- 2022Mind the Gap: Understanding the Modality Gap in Multi-modal Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 553
- 2024Long-CLIP: Unlocking the Long-Text Capability of CLIPcited by 298
- 2022MuRAG: Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generator for Open Question Answering over Images and Textcited by 216
- 2021MultiModalQA: Complex Question Answering over Text, Tables and Imagescited by 177
- 2024GME: Improving Universal Multimodal Retrieval by Multimodal LLMscited by 166
- 2024MM-Embed: Universal Multimodal Retrieval with Multimodal LLMscited by 159
- 2024VISTA: Visualized Text Embedding For Universal Multi-Modal Retrievalcited by 67
- 2022Universal Vision-Language Dense Retrieval: Learning A Unified Representation Space for Multi-Modal Retrievalcited by 57
- 2024Two Effects, One Trigger: On the Modality Gap, Object Bias, and Information Imbalance in Contrastive Vision-Language Modelscited by 55
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Fill the Gap: Quantifying and Reducing the Modality Gap in Image-Text Representation Learning
- 2025Multimodal Representation Alignment for Cross-modal Information Retrieval
- 2026One Geometry, Different Outcomes: Readout-Dependent Effects of the Modality Gap in Vision-Language Models
- 2024CAST: Cross-modal Alignment Similarity Test for Vision Language Models
- 2023Cross-Modal Retrieval: A Systematic Review of Methods and Future Directions
- 2025Same Content, Different Answers: Cross-Modal Inconsistency in MLLMs
- 2025Cross the Gap: Exposing the Intra-modal Misalignment in CLIP via Modality Inversion
- 2026Is the Modality Gap a Bug or a Feature? A Robustness Perspective