Mechanisms of Non-Monotonic Scaling in Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deeper Vision Transformers often perform worse than shallower ones, which challenges common scaling assumptions. Through a systematic empirical analysis of ViT-S, ViT-B, and ViT-L on ImageNet, we identify a consistent three-phase Cliff-Plateau-Climb pattern that governs how representations evolve with depth. We observe that better performance is associated with progressive marginalization of the [CLS] token, originally designed as a global aggregation hub, in favor of distributed consensus among patch tokens. We quantify patterns of information mixing with an Information Scrambling Index, and show that in ViT-L the information-task tradeoff emerges roughly 10 layers later than in ViT-B, and that these additional layers correlate with increased information diffusion rather than improved task performance. Taken together, these results suggest that transformer architectures in this regime may benefit more from carefully calibrated depth that executes clean phase transitions than from simply increasing parameter count. The Information Scrambling Index provides a useful diagnostic for existing models and suggests a potential design target for future architectures. All code is available at: https://github.com/AnanthaPadmanaban-KrishnaKumar/Cliff-Plateau-Climb.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2025.
Builds on
16 of 18 references.
References · 16
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
- 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 864
- 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
- 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 694
- 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 419
- 2021Conditional Positional Encodings for Vision Transformerscited by 406
- 2021Deep ViT Features as Dense Visual Descriptorscited by 330
- 2021DeepViT: Towards Deeper Vision Transformercited by 289
- 2021Rethinking and Improving Relative Position Encoding for Vision Transformercited by 207
- 2019The Bottom-up Evolution of Representations in the Transformer: A Study with Machine Translation and Language Modeling Objectivescited by 139
4 more
- 2022Anti-Oversmoothing in Deep Vision Transformers via the Fourier Domain Analysis: From Theory to Practicecited by 136
- 2023Getting ViT in Shape: Scaling Laws for Compute-Optimal Model Designcited by 89
- 2024Dynamic Tuning Towards Parameter and Inference Efficiency for ViT Adaptationcited by 25
- 2024Guiding Neural Collapse: Optimising Towards the Nearest Simplex Equiangular Tight Framecited by 14
Built on by
Not cited yet.