Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-based Time Series Classification
On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → Interpreting time-series and weather models
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer-based models have become state-of-the-art tools in various machine learning tasks, including time series classification, yet their complexity makes understanding their internal decision-making challenging. Existing explainability methods often focus on input-output attributions, leaving the internal mechanisms largely opaque. This paper addresses this gap by adapting various Mechanistic Interpretability techniques; activation patching, attention saliency, and sparse autoencoders, from NLP to transformer architectures designed explicitly for time series classification. We systematically probe the internal causal roles of individual attention heads and timesteps, revealing causal structures within these models. Through experimentation on a benchmark time series dataset, we construct causal graphs illustrating how information propagates internally, highlighting key attention heads and temporal positions driving correct classifications. Additionally, we demonstrate the potential of sparse autoencoders for uncovering interpretable latent features. Our findings provide both methodological contributions to transformer interpretability and novel insights into the functional mechanics underlying transformer performance in time series classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Interpreting time-series and weather models, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 11 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Nov 2025.
Builds on
11 of 18 references.
References · 11
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,420
- 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
- 2022Transformers in Time Series: A Surveycited by 497
- 2020A Transformer-based Framework for Multivariate Time Series Representation Learningcited by 453
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 389
- 2019ROCKET: Exceptionally fast and accurate time series classification using random convolutional kernelscited by 339
- 2024How to use and interpret activation patchingcited by 214
- 2019catch22: CAnonical Time-series CHaracteristicscited by 105
- 2024Interpreting Time Series Transformer Models and Sensitivity Analysis of Population Age Groups to COVID-19 Infectionscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Dissecting Chronos: Sparse Autoencoders Reveal Causal Feature Hierarchies in Time Series Foundation Modelscited by 2
- 2026Superposition Is Not Necessary: A Mechanistic Interpretability Analysis of Transformer Representations for Time Series Forecastingcited by 1
- 2026Interpretability in Deep Time Series Models Demands Semantic Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Superposition Is Not Necessary: A Mechanistic Interpretability Analysis of Transformer Representations for Time Series Forecasting6 May 2026
- 2026Dissecting Chronos: Sparse Autoencoders Reveal Causal Feature Hierarchies in Time Series Foundation Models10 Mar 2026
- 2026Interpretability in Deep Time Series Models Demands Semantic Alignment2 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Interpretability for Time Series Transformers using A Concept Bottleneck Framework
- 2023Encoding Time-Series Explanations through Self-Supervised Model Behavior Consistency
- 2025A Mechanistic Analysis of Transformers for Dynamical Systems
- 2026Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural Networks: Circuits, Sparse Features and Symbolic Reasoning
- 2026EXCODER: EXplainable Classification Of DiscretE time series Representations
- 2026TimeSAE: Causal Sparse Decoding for Faithful Explanations of Black-Box Time Series Models
- 2024CausalFormer: An Interpretable Transformer for Temporal Causal Discovery
- 2024Interpreting Attention Layer Outputs with Sparse Autoencoders