mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PaTAS: A Framework for Trust Propagation in Neural Networks Using Subjective Logic

arXiv 2511.20586 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2025cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trustworthiness has become a key requirement for deploying artificial intelligence in safety-critical applications, yet conventional metrics such as accuracy fail to capture uncertainty or the reliability of predictions, particularly under adversarial or degraded conditions. This paper introduces the Parallel Trust Assessment System (PaTAS), a framework for modeling and propagating trust in neural networks using Subjective Logic (SL). PaTAS operates in parallel with standard neural computation through Trust Nodes and Trust Functions that propagate input, parameter, and activation trust across the network, refining parameter trust during training (Parameter Trust Update) and returning a per-inference trust opinion, quantifying belief, disbelief, and uncertainty, on each prediction (Inference-Path Trust Assessment). Experiments on real-world and adversarial datasets show that these estimates are interpretable and stable and complement accuracy: PaTAS flags predictions that remain accurate yet rely on parameters learned from corrupted data, detects adversarially patched inputs without knowledge of the trigger, and audits training-label corruption without any test data. Compared with output-only uncertainty baselines and dedicated input- and feature-space detectors, out-of-distribution and corruption detection is carried by the conformity-derived input opinions PaTAS consumes, within a regime that a per-dataset diagnostic identifies in advance; trust propagation adds model-side signals these detectors lack, and the composed trust degrades gracefully where any single signal fails. The mechanism extends to convolutional networks. PaTAS thereby provides a foundation for transparent, quantifiable trust reasoning across the AI lifecycle.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.

Builds on

26 of 60 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  5. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  6. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  7. 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
  8. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  9. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  10. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  11. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,012
  12. 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
14 more
  1. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  2. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
  3. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
  4. 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
  5. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  6. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  7. 2020Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Securitycited by 98
  8. 2025From Calibration to Collaboration: LLM Uncertainty Quantification Should Be More Human-Centeredcited by 21
  9. 2024Establishing and Evaluating Trustworthy AI: Overview and Research Challengescited by 12
  10. 2025Your other Left! Vision-Language Models Fail to Identify Relative Positions in Medical Imagescited by 12
  11. 2018Multi-Source Fusion Operations in Subjective Logiccited by 2
  12. 2024Quantifying Calibration Error in Neural Networks Through Evidence-Based Theorycited by 2
  13. 2024Trustworthy Transfer Learning: A Surveycited by 1
  14. 2025Assessing Trustworthiness of AI Training Dataset using Subjective Logic -- A Use Case on Biascited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.