mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Making of Digital Ghosts: Designing Ethical AI Afterlives

arXiv 2511.20094 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2025cs.CY cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Advances in artificial intelligence now make it possible to simulate the dead through chatbots, voice clones, and video avatars trained on a person's digital traces. These "digital ghosts" are moving from fiction to commercial reality, reshaping how people mourn and remember. This paper offers a conceptual and ethical analysis of AI-mediated digital afterlives. We define what counts as a digital ghost, trace their rise across personal, commercial, and institutional contexts, and identify core ethical tensions around grief and well-being, truthfulness and deception, consent and posthumous privacy, dignity and misrepresentation, and the commercialization of mourning. To analyze these challenges, we propose a nine-dimensional taxonomy of digital afterlife technologies and, building on it, outline the features of an ethically acceptable digital ghost: premortem intent, mutual consent, transparent and limited data use, clear disclosure, restricted purposes and access, family or estate stewardship, and minimal behavioral agency. We argue for targeted regulation and professional guidelines to ensure that digital ghosts can aid remembrance without slipping into forms of deception.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.

Builds on

4 of 67 references.

References · 4

  1. 2023Creating a Large Language Model of a Philosophercited by 20
  2. 2024Generative Ghosts: Anticipating Benefits and Risks of AI Afterlivescited by 15
  3. 2025Digital Dybbuks and Virtual Golems: The Ethics of Digital Duplicates in Holocaust Testimonycited by 3
  4. 2020Engineering Privacy by Design: Are engineers ready to live up to the challenge?cited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.