Frequency Bias Matters: Diving into Robust and Generalized Deep Image Forgery Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As deep image forgery powered by AI generative models, such as GANs, continues to challenge today's digital world, detecting AI-generated forgeries has become a vital security topic. Generalizability and robustness are two critical concerns of a forgery detector, determining its reliability when facing unknown GANs and noisy samples in an open world. Although many studies focus on improving these two properties, the root causes of these problems have not been fully explored, and it is unclear if there is a connection between them. Moreover, despite recent achievements in addressing these issues from image forensic or anti-forensic aspects, a universal method that can contribute to both sides simultaneously remains practically significant yet unavailable. In this paper, we provide a fundamental explanation of these problems from a frequency perspective. Our analysis reveals that the frequency bias of a DNN forgery detector is a possible cause of generalization and robustness issues. Based on this finding, we propose a two-step frequency alignment method to remove the frequency discrepancy between real and fake images, offering double-sided benefits: it can serve as a strong black-box attack against forgery detectors in the anti-forensic context or, conversely, as a universal defense to improve detector reliability in the forensic context. We also develop corresponding attack and defense implementations and demonstrate their effectiveness, as well as the effect of the frequency alignment method, in various experimental settings involving twelve detectors, eight forgery models, and five metrics.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 53 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2025.
Builds on
53 of 70 references.
References · 53
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,988
- 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
38 more
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,318
- 2019CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for nowcited by 847
- 2020Face2Face: Real-time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videoscited by 632
- 2020Leveraging Frequency Analysis for Deep Fake Image Recognitioncited by 504
- 2023Towards Universal Fake Image Detectors that Generalize Across Generative Modelscited by 490
- 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 368
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019Detecting and Simulating Artifacts in GAN Fake Imagescited by 293
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
- 2020What makes fake images detectable? Understanding properties that generalizecited by 273
- 2021Spatial-Phase Shallow Learning: Rethinking Face Forgery Detection in Frequency Domaincited by 244
- 2020Focal Frequency Loss for Image Reconstruction and Synthesiscited by 206
- 2018Do GANs leave artificial fingerprints?cited by 190
- 2019Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated Imagescited by 139
- 2019Detecting GAN generated Fake Images using Co-occurrence Matricescited by 124
- 2019Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Surveycited by 102
- 2020Evading Deepfake-Image Detectors with White- and Black-Box Attackscited by 80
- 2022FrePGAN: Robust Deepfake Detection Using Frequency-level Perturbationscited by 75
- 2020Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examplescited by 66
- 2020Exposing GAN-generated Faces Using Inconsistent Corneal Specular Highlightscited by 59
- 2019Incremental learning for the detection and classification of GAN-generated imagescited by 58
- 2020Adversarial Perturbations Fool Deepfake Detectorscited by 48
- 2020Adversarial Threats to DeepFake Detection: A Practical Perspectivecited by 48
- 2021Beyond the Spectrum: Detecting Deepfakes via Re-Synthesiscited by 44
- 2019GANprintR: Improved Fakes and Evaluation of the State of the Art in Face Manipulation Detectioncited by 42
- 2020CNN Detection of GAN-Generated Face Images based on Cross-Band Co-occurrences Analysiscited by 42
- 2022RepMix: Representation Mixing for Robust Attribution of Synthesized Imagescited by 39
- 2020SSD-GAN: Measuring the Realness in the Spatial and Spectral Domainscited by 38
- 2020FakePolisher: Making DeepFakes More Detection-Evasive by Shallow Reconstructioncited by 33
- 2020Spectral Distribution Aware Image Generationcited by 29
- 2020FDFtNet: Facing Off Fake Images using Fake Detection Fine-tuning Networkcited by 19
- 2022Making DeepFakes more spurious: evading deep face forgery detection via trace removal attackcited by 16
- 2018On the Transferability of Adversarial Examples Against CNN-Based Image Forensicscited by 12
- 2023Learning Pairwise Interaction for Generalizable DeepFake Detectioncited by 11
50 most cited of 53 All 53 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Semantic Manipulation Localizationcited by 1
- 2026Semantic Manipulation Localization11 Apr 2026