mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Empirical Comparison of Forgetting Mechanisms for UCB-based Algorithms on a Data-Driven Simulation Platform

arXiv 2511.19240 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many real-world bandit problems involve non-stationary reward distributions, where the optimal decision may shift due to evolving environments. However, the performance of some typical Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) models such as Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) algorithms degrades significantly in non-stationary environments where reward distributions change over time. To address this limitation, this paper introduces and evaluates FDSW-UCB, a novel dual-view algorithm that integrates a discount-based long-term perspective with a sliding-window-based short-term view. A data-driven semi-synthetic simulation platform, built upon the MovieLens-1M and Open Bandit datasets, is developed to test algorithm adaptability under abrupt and gradual drift scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that a well-configured sliding-window mechanism (SW-UCB) is robust, while the widely used discounting method (D-UCB) suffers from a fundamental learning failure, leading to linear regret. Crucially, the proposed FDSW-UCB, when employing an optimistic aggregation strategy, achieves superior performance in dynamic settings, highlighting that the ensemble strategy itself is a decisive factor for success.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.

Builds on

2 of 11 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Open Bandit Dataset and Pipeline: Towards Realistic and Reproducible Off-Policy Evaluationcited by 77
  2. 2023Data-Driven Online Model Selection With Regret Guaranteescited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.