mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fairness Meets Privacy: Integrating Differential Privacy and Demographic Parity in Multi-class Classification

arXiv 2511.18876 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing use of machine learning in sensitive applications demands algorithms that simultaneously preserve data privacy and ensure fairness across potentially sensitive sub-populations. While privacy and fairness have each been extensively studied, their joint treatment remains poorly understood. Existing research often frames them as conflicting objectives, with multiple studies suggesting that strong privacy notions such as differential privacy inevitably compromise fairness. In this work, we challenge that perspective by showing that differential privacy can be integrated into a fairness-enhancing pipeline with minimal impact on fairness guarantees. We design a postprocessing algorithm, called DP2DP, that enforces both demographic parity and differential privacy. Our analysis reveals that our algorithm converges towards its demographic parity objective at essentially the same rate (up logarithmic factor) as the best non-private methods from the literature. Experiments on both synthetic and real datasets confirm our theoretical results, showing that the proposed algorithm achieves state-of-the-art accuracy/fairness/privacy trade-offs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2025.

Builds on

19 of 42 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  2. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,515
  3. 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
  4. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  5. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
  6. 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
  7. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
  8. 2020On the Privacy Risks of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 82
  9. 2018Differentially Private Fair Learningcited by 76
  10. 2020Neither Private Nor Fair: Impact of Data Imbalance on Utility and Fairness in Differential Privacycited by 61
  11. 2022Privacy of Noisy Stochastic Gradient Descent: More Iterations without More Privacy Losscited by 61
  12. 2020Differentially Private and Fair Deep Learning: A Lagrangian Dual Approachcited by 53
7 more
  1. 2022Differential Privacy and Fairness in Decisions and Learning Tasks: A Surveycited by 47
  2. 2017A Regularized Framework for Sparse and Structured Neural Attentioncited by 38
  3. 2021DP-SGD vs PATE: Which Has Less Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy?cited by 33
  4. 2022How unfair is private learning ?cited by 18
  5. 2022Differential Privacy has Bounded Impact on Fairness in Classificationcited by 18
  6. 2022Stochastic Differentially Private and Fair Learningcited by 16
  7. 2023FairDP: Certified Fairness with Differential Privacycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.