mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RRaPINNs: Residual Risk-Aware Physics Informed Neural Networks

arXiv 2511.18515 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) typically minimize average residuals, which can conceal large, localized errors. We propose Residual Risk-Aware Physics-Informed Neural Networks PINNs (RRaPINNs), a single-network framework that optimizes tail-focused objectives using Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), we also introduced a Mean-Excess (ME) surrogate penalty to directly control worst-case PDE residuals. This casts PINN training as risk-sensitive optimization and links it to chance-constrained formulations. The method is effective and simple to implement. Across several partial differential equations (PDEs) such as Burgers, Heat, Korteweg-de-Vries, and Poisson (including a Poisson interface problem with a source jump at x=0.5) equations, RRaPINNs reduce tail residuals while maintaining or improving mean errors compared to vanilla PINNs, Residual-Based Attention and its variant using convolution weighting; the ME surrogate yields smoother optimization than a direct CVaR hinge. The chance constraint reliability level α acts as a transparent knob trading bulk accuracy (lower α ) for stricter tail control (higher α ). We discuss the framework limitations, including memoryless sampling, global-only tail budgeting, and residual-centric risk, and outline remedies via persistent hard-point replay, local risk budgets, and multi-objective risk over BC/IC terms. RRaPINNs offer a practical path to reliability-aware scientific ML for both smooth and discontinuous PDEs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2025.

Builds on

13 of 34 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,341
  2. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  3. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  4. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
  5. 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 335
  6. 2022A comprehensive study of non-adaptive and residual-based adaptive sampling for physics-informed neural networkscited by 236
  7. 2020Self-Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks using a Soft Attention Mechanismcited by 233
  8. 2016Variance-based regularization with convex objectivescited by 155
  9. 2020Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networkscited by 135
  10. 2023Residual-based attention in physics-informed neural networkscited by 72
  11. 2022Failure-informed adaptive sampling for PINNscited by 64
  12. 2017Learning with Average Top-k Losscited by 52
1 more
  1. 2025Convolution-weighting method for the physics-informed neural network: A Primal-Dual Optimization Perspectivecited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.