mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Extreme Model Compression for Edge Vision-Language Models: Sparse Temporal Token Fusion and Adaptive Neural Compression

arXiv 2511.18504 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2025cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency

Abstract (arXiv)

The demand for edge AI in vision-language tasks requires models that achieve real-time performance on resource-constrained devices with limited power and memory. This paper proposes two adaptive compression techniques -- Sparse Temporal Token Fusion (STTF) and Adaptive Neural Compression (ANC) -- that integrate algorithmic innovations with hardware-aware optimizations. Unlike previous approaches relying on static pruning or uniform scaling, STTF dynamically reuses visual tokens through event-driven change detection, while ANC conditionally activates encoder branches via a learned router, enabling fine-grained adaptation to scene complexity. Our 3B-parameter TinyGPT-STTF achieves CIDEr 131.2, BLEU-4 0.38, METEOR 0.31, and ROUGE-L 0.56 on the COCO 2017 test set, surpassing LLaVA-1.5 7B by 17.6 CIDEr points while using 2.3x fewer parameters and 62x fewer on-device FLOPs. TinyGPT-ANC reaches CIDEr 128.5. On event-based vision tasks, STTF reduces average token count by 84% (from 196 to 31 tokens) while preserving 95.6% accuracy on the DVS128 Gesture dataset, and ANC cuts FLOPs by up to 90% in low-motion scenes. Compared to strong baselines, our models improve accuracy by up to 4.4% and reduce latency by up to 13x. These results enable efficient deployment of capable vision-language models on real-world edge devices.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 13 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2025.

Builds on

13 of 15 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
  4. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  5. 2017Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inferencecited by 1,593
  6. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
  7. 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 676
  8. 2021MobileViT: Light-weight, General-purpose, and Mobile-friendly Vision Transformercited by 642
  9. 2019Learned Step Size Quantizationcited by 628
  10. 2019Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets Winnerscited by 495
  11. 2019High Speed and High Dynamic Range Video with an Event Cameracited by 345
  12. 2022EfficientFormer: Vision Transformers at MobileNet Speedcited by 241
1 more
  1. 2021Learned Token Pruning for Transformerscited by 139

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Token Compression Meets Compact Vision Transformers: A Survey and Comparative Evaluation for Edge AI
  2. 2026CRAFT: Compression via Recursive Adaptive Fusion of Video Tokens for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Adaptive-VoCo: Complexity-Aware Visual Token Compression for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026VisCo: Leveraging Large Language Models as Intrinsic Encoders for Visual Token Compression
  5. 2026Vision Token Reduction via Attention-Driven Self-Compression for Efficient Multimodal Large Language Models
  6. 2026Beyond Independent Optimization: Compression, MoE Routing, and Quantization Interactions in Multimodal Edge Intelligence
  7. 2025Towards Efficient VLMs: Information-Theoretic Driven Compression via Adaptive Structural Pruning
  8. 2025A Glimpse to Compress: Dynamic Visual Token Pruning for Large Vision-Language Models