mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Progressive Localisation in Localist LLMs

arXiv 2511.18375 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper demonstrates that progressive localization, the gradual increase of attention locality from early distributed layers to late localized layers, represents the optimal architecture for creating interpretable large language models (LLMs) while preserving performance. Through systematic experimentation with GPT-2 fine-tuned on The Psychology of Artificial Superintelligence, we evaluate five locality configurations: two uniform baselines (fully distributed and fully localist) and three progressive polynomial schedules. We investigate whether interpretability constraints can be aligned with natural semantic structure while being applied strategically across network depth. We demonstrate that progressive semantic localization, combining adaptive semantic block partitioning with steep polynomial locality schedules, achieves near-baseline language modeling performance while providing interpretable attention patterns. Multiple independent training runs with different random seeds establish that results are statistically robust and highly reproducible. The approach dramatically outperforms both fixed-window localization and naive uniform locality constraints. Analysis reveals that maintaining flexibility through low-fidelity constraints preserves model capacity while providing interpretability benefits, and that steep schedules concentrating locality in decision-critical final layers while preserving distributed learning in early layers achieve near-baseline attention distribution characteristics. These findings demonstrate that interpretability mechanisms should align with semantic structure to achieve practical performance-interpretability tradeoffs for trustworthy AI systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2025.

Builds on

11 of 17 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  4. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  5. 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,546
  6. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  7. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 599
  8. 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 389
  9. 2025Localist LLMs -- A Mathematical Framework for Dynamic Locality Controlcited by 2
  10. 2025Localist LLMs with Recruitment Learningcited by 2
  11. 2025AILA--First Experiments with Localist Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026LoKiFormer: Locality-aware Attention with Decoupled Knowledge Memory for Efficient Large Language Model Pretraining
  2. 2024Probing Context Localization of Polysemous Words in Pre-trained Language Model Sub-Layers
  3. 2024LoFiT: Localized Fine-tuning on LLM Representations
  4. 2026Mechanisms of Object Localization in Vision-Language Models
  5. 2025Does Editing Provide Evidence for Localization?
  6. 2025LongLLaDA: Unlocking Long Context Capabilities in Diffusion LLMs
  7. 2026Compressed Sensing for Capability Localization in Large Language Models
  8. 2024Extracting Interpretable Task-Specific Circuits from Large Language Models for Faster Inference