mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Software Engineering Simulations Lab: Agentic AI for RE Quality Simulations

arXiv 2511.17762 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2025cs.SEcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Context and motivation. Requirements Engineering (RE) quality still lacks empirical evidence on how specific requirement defects affect downstream activities. Problem: However, empirical data on the detailed effects of requirements quality defects is scarce, since it is costly to obtain. Furthermore, with the advent of AI-based development, the requirements quality factors may change: Requirements are no longer only consumed by humans, but increasingly also by AI agents, which might lead to a different efficient and effective requirements style. Principal ideas: We propose to extend the RE research toolbox with Agentic AI simulations, in which software engineering (SE) processes are replicated by standardized agents in qualitative simulations. We argue that their speed and simplicity makes them a valuable addition to RE research, although limitations in replicating human behavior need to be studied and understood. Contribution: This paper contributes a first concept, a research roadmap, a prototype, and a first feasibility study for RE simulations with agentic AI. Study results indicate that even a na"ive implementation leads to executable simulations, encouraging technical improvements along with broader application in RE research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2025.

Builds on

11 of 17 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Agents in Software Engineering: Survey, Landscape, and Vision13 Sep

Other references · 10

  1. 2023Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 389
  2. 2023Investigating ChatGPT's Potential to Assist in Requirements Elicitation Processescited by 25
  3. 2023Reinforcement Learning from Automatic Feedback for High-Quality Unit Test Generationcited by 21
  4. 2024Requirements are All You Need: From Requirements to Code with LLMscited by 21
  5. 2025Guidelines for Empirical Studies in Software Engineering involving Large Language Modelscited by 18
  6. 2024Leveraging LLMs for the Quality Assurance of Software Requirementscited by 15
  7. 2024Model Generation with LLMs: From Requirements to UML Sequence Diagramscited by 11
  8. 2024Does GenAI Make Usability Testing Obsolete?cited by 6
  9. 2025On the Impact of Requirements Smells in Prompts: The Case of Automated Traceabilitycited by 4
  10. 2023Requirements Quality Research: a harmonized Theory, Evaluation, and Roadmapcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Agent4RE: A Self-Refining Multi-agent Framework for End-to-End Software Requirements Engineering and Benchmarking
  2. 2026Rethinking Software Engineering for Agentic AI Systems
  3. 2026On the Viability of Requirements Generation From Code: An Experience Report ↗
  4. 2026From Obligation to Specification: A Survey on Validating EU AI Act Requirements in RE
  5. 2025From Correctness to Collaboration: Toward a Human-Centered Framework for Evaluating AI Agent Behavior in Software Engineering
  6. 2026Two Truths and A Lie? Benchmarking Off-the-Shelf LLMs for Requirements Quality Assessment: Performance, False Alarms, and Misses ↗
  7. 2026Reality Is the Final Verifier: On Two Key Gaps in Agentic Software Engineering
  8. 2026How Do Practitioners Build SE Agents? Insights from a Mixed-Methods Study