Monte Carlo Expected Threat (MOCET) Scoring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating and measuring AI Safety Level (ASL) threats are crucial for guiding stakeholders to implement safeguards that keep risks within acceptable limits. ASL-3+ models present a unique risk in their ability to uplift novice non-state actors, especially in the realm of biosecurity. Existing evaluation metrics, such as LAB-Bench, BioLP-bench, and WMDP, can reliably assess model uplift and domain knowledge. However, metrics that better contextualize "real-world risks" are needed to inform the safety case for LLMs, along with scalable, open-ended metrics to keep pace with their rapid advancements. To address both gaps, we introduce MOCET, an interpretable and doubly-scalable metric (automatable and open-ended) that can quantify real-world risks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2025.
Builds on
5 of 16 references.
References · 5
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
- 2023Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4cited by 379
- 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 165
Built on by
Not cited yet.