mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Monte Carlo Expected Threat (MOCET) Scoring

arXiv 2511.16823 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating and measuring AI Safety Level (ASL) threats are crucial for guiding stakeholders to implement safeguards that keep risks within acceptable limits. ASL-3+ models present a unique risk in their ability to uplift novice non-state actors, especially in the realm of biosecurity. Existing evaluation metrics, such as LAB-Bench, BioLP-bench, and WMDP, can reliably assess model uplift and domain knowledge. However, metrics that better contextualize "real-world risks" are needed to inform the safety case for LLMs, along with scalable, open-ended metrics to keep pace with their rapid advancements. To address both gaps, we introduce MOCET, an interpretable and doubly-scalable metric (automatable and open-ended) that can quantify real-world risks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2025.

Builds on

5 of 16 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  4. 2023Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4cited by 379
  5. 2018The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigationcited by 165

Built on by

Not cited yet.