Change-of-Basis Pruning via Rotational Invariance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Structured pruning removes entire neurons or channels, but its effectiveness depends on how importance is distributed across the representation space. Change-of-basis (CoB) pruning addresses this challenge by applying orthogonal linear transformations that concentrate importance within certain dimensions. However, many standard deep learning architectures are not inherently invariant to such transformations. To enable compatibility, we introduce two-subspace radial activations (TSRAs): an activation family that is invariant to orthogonal linear transformations applied independently within its two activation subspaces. This invariance allows CoB transformations to be merged into surrounding weights without incurring extra parameters. We position this work as a proof-of-concept that a rotationally invariant design may offer a principled approach towards change-of-basis pruning. We do not provide an analysis of multiple TSRA candidates nor do we explore weight initialization for any TSRAs. These limitations, combined with other necessary modifications we make to permit rotational invariance, result in a slight accuracy drop of 4.52% compared to a ReLU-based control. However, using activation-magnitude importance, VGG-16 implementing our CoB+TSRA framework shows encouraging results on CIFAR-10. Under fixed-ratio structured pruning, CoB improves accuracy over a TSRA baseline at all pruning ratios and extends reliable pruning frontier from roughly 30% to 70% of parameters without post-prune fine tuning. Under threshold-based pruning strategies, CoB prunes 90-96% of parameters while maintaining 1-6% accuracy drop after fine-tuning. Together, these results indicate that rotationally invariant architectures may offer a promising path towards CoB pruning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2025.
Builds on
11 of 16 references.
References · 11
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
- 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
- 2023Large Language Modelscited by 780
- 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 702
- 2017Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimmingcited by 676
- 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
- 2023Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A surveycited by 122
- 2025DenoiseRotator: Enhance Pruning Robustness for LLMs via Importance Concentrationcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.