mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cost-Aware Prediction (CAP): An LLM-Enhanced Machine Learning Pipeline and Decision Support System for Heart Failure Mortality Prediction

arXiv 2511.15357 ↗First posted 19 Nov 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Objective: Machine learning (ML) predictive models are often developed without considering downstream value trade-offs and clinical interpretability. This paper introduces a cost-aware prediction (CAP) framework that combines cost-benefit analysis assisted by large language model (LLM) agents to communicate the trade-offs involved in applying ML predictions. Materials and Methods: We developed an ML model predicting 1-year mortality in patients with heart failure (N = 30,021, 22% mortality) to identify those eligible for home care. We then introduced clinical impact projection (CIP) curves to visualize important cost dimensions - quality of life and healthcare provider expenses, further divided into treatment and error costs, to assess the clinical consequences of predictions. Finally, we used four LLM agents to generate patient-specific descriptions. The system was evaluated by clinicians for its decision support value. Results: The eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB) model achieved the best performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.804 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.792-0.816), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.529 (95% CI 0.502-0.558) and a Brier score of 0.135 (95% CI 0.130-0.140). Discussion: The CIP cost curves provided a population-level overview of cost composition across decision thresholds, whereas LLM-generated cost-benefit analysis at individual patient-levels. The system was well received according to the evaluation by clinicians. However, feedback emphasizes the need to strengthen the technical accuracy for speculative tasks. Conclusion: CAP utilizes LLM agents to integrate ML classifier outcomes and cost-benefit analysis for more transparent and interpretable decision support.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2025.

Builds on

2 of 39 references.

References · 2

  1. 2021CEHR-BERT: Incorporating temporal information from structured EHR data to improve prediction taskscited by 76
  2. 2025Explainable AI for Clinical Outcome Prediction: A Survey of Clinician Perceptions and Preferencescited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025LLM-Augmented Symptom Analysis for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction: A Clinical NLP
  2. 2026Standalone LLM and a Pre-specified Agentic Pipeline for Explaining ICU Mortality Predictions: a Feasibility Study on the eICU Demo Dataset
  3. 2026Integrating Machine Learning Ensembles and Large Language Models for Heart Disease Prediction Using Voting Fusion
  4. 2025CardioCoT: Hierarchical Reasoning for Multimodal Survival Analysis
  5. 2025REACT-LLM: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Integration with Causal Features in Clinical Prognostic Tasks
  6. 2025ClinNoteAgents: An LLM Multi-Agent System for Predicting and Interpreting Heart Failure 30-Day Readmission from Clinical Notes
  7. 2026Improving Medical Calculation of LLMs with Embedded Coding
  8. 2026LLM-Extracted Covariates for Clinical Causal Inference: Rethinking Integration Strategies