mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Extrinsic Total-Variance and Coplanarity via Oriented and Classical Projective Shape Analysis

arXiv 2511.14815 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2025stat.ME stat.APcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Projective shape analysis provides a geometric framework for studying digital images acquired by pinhole digital cameras. In the classical projective shape (PS) method, landmark configurations are represented in (RP2)k-4, where k is the number of landmarks observed. This representation is invariant under the action of the full projective group on this space and is sign-blind, so opposite directions in R3 determine the same projective point and front--back orientation of a surface is not recorded. Oriented projective shape (OPS) restores this information by working on a product of k-4 spheres SP2 instead of projective space and restricting attention to the orientation-preserving subgroup of projective transformations. In this paper we introduce an extrinsic total-variance index for OPS, resulting in the extrinsic Fr'echet framework for the m dimensional case from the inclusion jdir:(SPm)qhookrightarrow(Rm+1)q,q=k-m-2. In the planar pentad case (m=2, q=1) the sample total extrinsic variance has a closed form in terms of the mean of a random sample of size n of oriented projective coordinates in S2. As an illustration, using an oriented projective frame, we analyze the Sope Creek stone data set, a benchmark and nearly planar example with 41 images and 5 landmarks. Using a delta-method applied to a large sample and a generalized Slutsky theorem argument, for an OPS leave-two-out diagnostic, one identifies coplanarity at the 5% level, confirming the concentrated data coplanarity PS result in Patrangenaru(2001)citePatrangenaru2001.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.