mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SCI: A Metacognitive Control for Signal Dynamics

arXiv 2511.12240 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.SYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern deep learning systems are typically deployed as open-loop function approximators: they map inputs to outputs in a single pass, without regulating how much computation or explanatory effort is spent on a given case. In safety-critical settings, this is brittle: easy and ambiguous inputs receive identical processing, and uncertainty is only read off retrospectively from raw probabilities. We introduce the Surgical Cognitive Interpreter (SCI), a lightweight closed-loop metacognitive control layer that wraps an existing stochastic model and turns prediction into an iterative process. SCI monitors a scalar interpretive state SP(t), here instantiated as a normalized entropy-based confidence signal, and adaptively decides whether to stop, continue sampling, or abstain. The goal is not to improve accuracy per se, but to regulate interpretive error DeltaSP and expose a safety signal that tracks when the underlying model is likely to fail. We instantiate SCI around Monte Carlo dropout classifiers in three domains: vision (MNIST digits), medical time series (MIT-BIH arrhythmia), and industrial condition monitoring (rolling-element bearings). In all cases, the controller allocates more inference steps to misclassified inputs than to correct ones (up to about 3-4x on MNIST and bearings, and 1.4x on MIT-BIH). The resulting DeltaSP acts as a usable safety signal for detecting misclassifications (AUROC 0.63 on MNIST, 0.70 on MIT-BIH, 0.86 on bearings). Code and reproducibility: https://github.com/vishal-1344/sci

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2025.

Builds on

4 of 24 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 287
  4. 2024Towards Unifying Interpretability and Control: Evaluation via Interventioncited by 32

Built on by

Not cited yet.