Consistency Is the Key: Detecting Hallucinations in LLM Generated Text By Checking Inconsistencies About Key Facts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs), despite their remarkable text generation capabilities, often hallucinate and generate text that is factually incorrect and not grounded in real-world knowledge. This poses serious risks in domains like healthcare, finance, and customer support. A typical way to use LLMs is via the APIs provided by LLM vendors where there is no access to model weights or options to fine-tune the model. Existing methods to detect hallucinations in such settings where the model access is restricted or constrained by resources typically require making multiple LLM API calls, increasing latency and API cost. We introduce CONFACTCHECK, an efficient hallucination detection approach that does not leverage any external knowledge base and works on the simple intuition that responses to factual probes within the generated text should be consistent within a single LLM and across different LLMs. Rigorous empirical evaluation on multiple datasets that cover both the generation of factual texts and the open generation shows that CONFACTCHECK can detect hallucinated facts efficiently using fewer resources and achieves higher accuracy scores compared to existing baselines that operate under similar conditions. Our code is available here.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2025.
Builds on
18 of 36 references.
References · 18
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
- 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
- 2023FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generationcited by 1,259
- 2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languagescited by 719
- 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 691
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 319
- 2023Fine-tuning Language Models for Factualitycited by 219
- 2023LM vs LM: Detecting Factual Errors via Cross Examinationcited by 155
- 2021A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generationcited by 137
6 more
- 2023SAC3: Reliable Hallucination Detection in Black-Box Language Models via Semantic-aware Cross-check Consistencycited by 89
- 2023A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level Hallucination Detectioncited by 42
- 2024InterrogateLLM: Zero-Resource Hallucination Detection in LLM-Generated Answerscited by 26
- 2024Small Agent Can Also Rock! Empowering Small Language Models as Hallucination Detectorcited by 20
- 2024SH2: Self-Highlighted Hesitation Helps You Decode More Truthfullycited by 15
- 2018A Stable and Effective Learning Strategy for Trainable Greedy Decodingcited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026All That Glisters Is Not Gold: A Benchmark for Reference-Free Counterfactual Financial Misinformation Detectioncited by 4
- 2026Hallucinations Live in Variancecited by 4
- 2026HIVE: Hidden-Evidence Verification for Hallucination Detection in Diffusion Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026R2VC: Modular Fact-Checking with Retrieval, Verification, and Confidence Calibrationcited by 0
- 2026R2VC: Modular Fact-Checking with Retrieval, Verification, and Confidence Calibration6 Aug 2026
- 2026HIVE: Hidden-Evidence Verification for Hallucination Detection in Diffusion Large Language Models28 Apr 2026
- 2026Hallucinations Live in Variance11 Jan 2026
- 2026All That Glisters Is Not Gold: A Benchmark for Reference-Free Counterfactual Financial Misinformation Detection7 Jan 2026