mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Flash-Fusion: Enabling Expressive, Low-Latency Queries on IoT Sensor Streams with LLMs

arXiv 2511.11885 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2025cs.DC cs.AI cs.DBcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Smart cities and pervasive IoT deployments have generated interest in IoT data analysis across transportation and urban planning. At the same time, Large Language Models offer a new interface for exploring IoT data - particularly through natural language. Users today face two key challenges when working with IoT data using LLMs: (1) data collection infrastructure is expensive, producing terabytes of low-level sensor readings that are too granular for direct use, and (2) data analysis is slow, requiring iterative effort and technical expertise. Directly feeding all IoT telemetry to LLMs is impractical due to finite context windows, prohibitive token costs at scale, and non-interactive latencies. What is missing is a system that first parses a user's query to identify the analytical task, then selects the relevant data slices, and finally chooses the right representation before invoking an LLM. We present Flash-Fusion, an end-to-end edge-cloud system that reduces the IoT data collection and analysis burden on users. Two principles guide its design: (1) edge-based statistical summarization (achieving 73.5% data reduction) to address data volume, and (2) cloud-based query planning that clusters behavioral data and assembles context-rich prompts to address data interpretation. We deploy Flash-Fusion on a university bus fleet and evaluate it against a baseline that feeds raw data to a state-of-the-art LLM. Flash-Fusion achieves a 95% latency reduction and 98% decrease in token usage and cost while maintaining high-quality responses. It enables personas across disciplines - safety officers, urban planners, fleet managers, and data scientists - to efficiently iterate over IoT data without the burden of manual query authoring or preprocessing.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.

Builds on

12 of 77 references.

References · 12

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,417
  3. 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Long Context Language Modelingcited by 117
  4. 2024LLMs Will Always Hallucinate, and We Need to Live With Thiscited by 78
  5. 2025LongCodeBench: Evaluating Coding LLMs at 1M Context Windowscited by 37
  6. 2023Trapping LLM Hallucinations Using Tagged Context Promptscited by 34
  7. 2025LaRA: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Long-Context LLMs -- No Silver Bullet for LC or RAG Routingcited by 29
  8. 2020Semantic Indexes for Machine Learning-based Queries over Unstructured Datacited by 11
  9. 2017Driving Behavior Analysis through CAN Bus Data in an Uncontrolled Environmentcited by 8
  10. 2022Vision Paper: Causal Inference for Interpretable and Robust Machine Learning in Mobility Analysiscited by 6
  11. 2025BloomIntent: Automating Search Evaluation with LLM-Generated Fine-Grained User Intentscited by 4
  12. 2015Context-aware Computing in the Internet of Things: A Survey on Internet of Things From Industrial Market Perspectivecited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.