mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MP-GFormer: A 3D-Geometry-Aware Dynamic Graph Transformer Approach for Machining Process Planning

arXiv 2511.11837 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machining process planning (MP) is inherently complex due to structural and geometrical dependencies among part features and machining operations. A key challenge lies in capturing dynamic interdependencies that evolve with distinct part geometries as operations are performed. Machine learning has been applied to address challenges in MP, such as operation selection and machining sequence prediction. Dynamic graph learning (DGL) has been widely used to model dynamic systems, thanks to its ability to integrate spatio-temporal relationships. However, in MP, while existing DGL approaches can capture these dependencies, they fail to incorporate three-dimensional (3D) geometric information of parts and thus lack domain awareness in predicting machining operation sequences. To address this limitation, we propose MP-GFormer, a 3D-geometry-aware dynamic graph transformer that integrates evolving 3D geometric representations into DGL through an attention mechanism to predict machining operation sequences. Our approach leverages StereoLithography surface meshes representing the 3D geometry of a part after each machining operation, with the boundary representation method used for the initial 3D designs. We evaluate MP-GFormer on a synthesized dataset and demonstrate that the method achieves improvements of 24% and 36% in accuracy for main and sub-operation predictions, respectively, compared to state-of-the-art approaches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
  4. 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 462
  5. 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 157
  6. 2018Dynamic Graph Representation Learning via Self-Attention Networkscited by 39
  7. 2023Dynamic Graph Representation Learning with Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 15
  8. 2022Planning Assembly Sequence with Graph Transformercited by 10
  9. 2025BRepFormer: Transformer-Based B-rep Geometric Feature Recognitioncited by 9
  10. 2024Dynamic Graph Transformer with Correlated Spatial-Temporal Positional Encodingcited by 6
  11. 2024Supra-Laplacian Encoding for Transformer on Dynamic Graphscited by 6
  12. 2025A Domain Adaptation of Large Language Models for Classifying Mechanical Assembly Componentscited by 5
2 more
  1. 2025TIDFormer: Exploiting Temporal and Interactive Dynamics Makes A Great Dynamic Graph Transformercited by 5
  2. 2025Generative Multimodal Multiscale Data Fusion for Digital Twins in Aerosol Jet Electronics Printingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.