Scaling Open-Weight Large Language Models for Hydropower Regulatory Information Extraction: A Systematic Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Information extraction from regulatory documents using large language models presents critical trade-offs between performance and computational resources. We evaluated seven open-weight models (0.6B-70B parameters) on hydropower licensing documentation to provide empirical deployment guidance. Our analysis identified a pronounced 14B parameter threshold where validation methods transition from ineffective (F1 < 0.15) to viable (F1 = 0.64). Consumer-deployable models achieve 64% F1 through appropriate validation, while smaller models plateau at 51%. Large-scale models approach 77% F1 but require enterprise infrastructure. We identified systematic hallucination patterns where perfect recall indicates extraction failure rather than success in smaller models. Our findings establish the first comprehensive resource-performance mapping for open-weight information extraction in regulatory contexts, enabling evidence-based model selection. These results provide immediate value for hydropower compliance while contributing insights into parameter scaling effects that generalize across information extraction tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.
Builds on
18 of 26 references.
References · 18
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
6 more
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
- 2013Speech Recognition with Deep Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 666
- 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 130
- 2023Self-contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and Mitigationcited by 123
- 2025Improving the Reliability of LLMs: Combining CoT, RAG, Self-Consistency, and Self-Verificationcited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.