mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Can LLMs Detect Their Own Hallucinations?

arXiv 2511.11087 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent responses, but sometimes hallucinate facts. In this paper, we investigate whether LLMs can detect their own hallucinations. We formulate hallucination detection as a classification task of a sentence. We propose a framework for estimating LLMs' capability of hallucination detection and a classification method using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) to extract knowledge from their parameters. The experimental results indicated that GPT-3.5 Turbo with CoT detected 58.2% of its own hallucinations. We concluded that LLMs with CoT can detect hallucinations if sufficient knowledge is contained in their parameters.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025(Im)possibility of Automated Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models
  2. 2025Chain-of-Thought Prompting Obscures Hallucination Cues in Large Language Models: An Empirical Evaluation
  3. 2023Chainpoll: A high efficacy method for LLM hallucination detection
  4. 2025HalluField: Detecting LLM Hallucinations via Field-Theoretic Modeling
  5. 2025Shaking to Reveal: Perturbation-Based Detection of LLM Hallucinations
  6. 2023Zero-Resource Hallucination Prevention for Large Language Models
  7. 2023HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models
  8. 2025SelfCheck-Eval: A Multi-Module Framework for Zero-Resource Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models