mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PATCHEVAL: A New Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Patching Real-World Vulnerabilities

arXiv 2511.11019 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.SEcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Software vulnerabilities are increasing at an alarming rate. However, manual patching is both time-consuming and resource-intensive, while existing automated vulnerability repair (AVR) techniques remain limited in effectiveness. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have opened a new paradigm for AVR, demonstrating remarkable progress. To examine the capability of LLMs in AVR, several vulnerability benchmarks have been proposed recently. However, they still suffer from key limitations of outdated vulnerabilities, limited language coverage, unreliable patch validation, and insufficient reproducibility. To overcome these challenges, we introduce PATCHEVAL, a multilingual benchmark for Go, JavaScript, and Python, languages for which existing benchmarks remain unexplored. PATCHEVAL curates a dataset of 1,000 vulnerabilities drawn from CVEs reported between 2015 and 2025, covering 65 distinct CWEs. A subset of 230 CVEs is further equipped with runtime sandbox environments, enabling patch verification through both security tests and functionality tests. To provide a systematic comparison of LLM-based vulnerability repair, we evaluate a series of state-of-the-art LLMs and agents, presenting an in-depth analysis that empirically yields key insights to guide future research in AVR.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 19.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026SEC-bench Pro: Can Language Models Solve Long-Horizon Software Security Tasks?cited by 8
  2. 2026CVE-Factory: Scaling Expert-Level Agentic Tasks for Code Security Vulnerabilitycited by 5
  3. 2026ZeroDayBench: Evaluating LLM Agents on Unseen Zero-Day Vulnerabilities for Cyberdefensecited by 3
  4. 2026FrogNano: Training a 4B Coding Agent via Online Task Synthesiscited by 3
  5. 2026EvoRepair: Enhancing Vulnerability Repair Agents Through Experience-Based Self-Evolutioncited by 2
  6. 2026Self-Evolving Coding Agentscited by 2
  7. 2026A Dual-Loop Agent Framework for Automated Vulnerability Reproductioncited by 1
  8. 2026SecCodeBench-V2 Technical Reportcited by 1
  9. 2026Why LLMs Fail: A Failure Analysis and Partial Success Measurement for Automated Security Patch Generationcited by 1
  10. 2026SEVRA-BENCH: Social Engineering of Vulnerabilities in Review Agentscited by 1
  11. 2026Beyond Refusal: A Same-Lineage Study of Aligned and Abliterated LLMs for Vulnerability Analysiscited by 1
  12. 2026Knowledge-Enhanced Agentic Vulnerability Repaircited by 0
7 more
  1. 2026From Runnable to Verifiable: An Independent Reproducibility Study of LLM/Agent-Driven Vulnerability Validation Artifactscited by 0
  2. 2026Activation Probes Surface Code-Security Signals that the Model's Output Missescited by 0
  3. 2026WeSCE: A Benchmark for Measuring Security Drift in LLM-Driven Code Editingcited by 0
  4. 2026Evaluating Multiple LLM Generations with Validated Task Coveragecited by 0
  5. 2026PatchBench: Evaluating AI Agents for Vulnerability Patchingcited by 0
  6. 2026SecureVibe: Making Vibe Coding More Securecited by 0
  7. 2026AuraForge: Scaling Security Supervision for Training Coding Agentscited by 0