mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Architecting software monitors for control-flow anomaly detection through large language models and conformance checking

arXiv 2511.10876 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2025cs.SE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Context: Ensuring high levels of dependability in modern computer-based systems has become increasingly challenging due to their complexity. Although systems are validated at design time, their behavior can be different at runtime, possibly showing control-flow anomalies due to ``unknown unknowns''. Objective: We aim to detect control-flow anomalies through software monitoring, which verifies runtime behavior by logging software execution and detecting deviations from expected control flow. Methods: We propose a methodology to develop software monitors for control-flow anomaly detection through Large Language Models (LLMs) and conformance checking. The methodology builds on existing software development practices to maintain traditional V&V while providing an additional level of robustness and trustworthiness. It leverages LLMs to link design-time models and implementation code, automating source-code instrumentation. The resulting event logs are analyzed via conformance checking, an explainable and effective technique for control-flow anomaly detection. Results: We test the methodology on a case-study scenario from the European Railway Traffic Management System / European Train Control System (ERTMS/ETCS), which is a railway standard for modern interoperable railways. The results obtained from the ERTMS/ETCS case study demonstrate that LLM-based source-code instrumentation can achieve up to 82.849% control-flow coverage of the reference design-time process model, while the subsequent conformance checking-based anomaly detection reaches a peak performance of 95.957% F1-score and 93.669% AUC. Conclusion: Incorporating domain-specific knowledge to guide LLMs in source-code instrumentation significantly allowed obtaining reliable and quality software logs and enabled effective control-flow anomaly detection through conformance checking.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2025.

Builds on

12 of 54 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  2. 2024The Effect of Sampling Temperature on Problem Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 168
  3. 2025Exploring the Impact of Temperature on Large Language Models:Hot or Cold?cited by 40
  4. 2023LogGPT: Log Anomaly Detection via GPTcited by 26
  5. 2020Unsupervised Anomaly Detectors to Detect Intrusions in the Current Threat Landscapecited by 7
  6. 2025Control-flow anomaly detection by process mining-based feature extraction and dimensionality reductioncited by 6
  7. 2023Log Statements Generation via Deep Learning: Widening the Support Provided to Developerscited by 3
  8. 2018From Model Checking to Runtime Verification and Backcited by 2
  9. 2022PREVENT: An Unsupervised Approach to Predict Software Failures in Productioncited by 2
  10. 2024White-box validation of quantitative product lines by statistical model checking and process miningcited by 2
  11. 2020Scalable Online Conformance Checking Using Incremental Prefix-Alignment Computationcited by 1
  12. 2022Data-driven Mutation Analysis for Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.