mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An accuracy-aware extension to LRP-based pruning for CNNs to prevent cascading accuracy degradation in data-scarce transfer learning

arXiv 2511.10861 ↗First posted 13 Nov 2025cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) pre-trained on large-scale datasets such as ImageNet are widely used as feature extractors to construct high-accuracy classification models from scarce data for specific tasks. In such scenarios, fine-tuning the pre-trained CNN is difficult due to data scarcity, necessitating the use of fixed weights. However, when the weights are kept fixed, many filters that do not contribute to the target task remain in the model, leading to unnecessary redundancy and reduced efficiency. Therefore, effective methods are needed to reduce model size by pruning filters that are unnecessary for inference. To address this, approaches utilizing Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) have been proposed. LRP quantifies the contribution of each filter to the inference result, enabling the pruning of filters with low relevance. However, existing LRP-based pruning methods have been observed to cause cascading accuracy degradation. In this study, we introduce an accuracy-aware pruning control mechanism for existing LRP-based filter pruning methods, which suppresses cascading accuracy degradation by dynamically adjusting the pruning rate and the pruning order using the harmonic mean of class accuracy, and compresses the pre-trained model while preserving task-specific performance in a small-data environment. We demonstrate that this control mechanism effectively mitigates cascading accuracy degradation and achieves higher classification accuracy compared to existing LRP-based pruning methods, improving the class-averaged area under the accuracy-pruning-rate curve (AUC) of VGG16 by approximately 15% over conventional LRP-based approaches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.

Builds on

10 of 22 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  3. 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
  4. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,255
  5. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,143
  6. 2020Rethinking Few-Shot Image Classification: a Good Embedding Is All You Need?cited by 437
  7. 2019Pruning by Explaining: A Novel Criterion for Deep Neural Network Pruningcited by 89
  8. 2021Factors of Influence for Transfer Learning across Diverse Appearance Domains and Task Typescited by 54
  9. 2024Pruning By Explaining Revisited: Optimizing Attribution Methods to Prune CNNs and Transformerscited by 11
  10. 2020Compressing Deep Convolutional Neural Networks by Stacking Low-dimensional Binary Convolution Filterscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.