An International Agreement to Prevent the Premature Creation of Artificial Superintelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Many experts argue that premature development of artificial superintelligence (ASI) poses catastrophic risks, including the risk of human extinction from misaligned ASI, geopolitical instability, and misuse by malicious actors. This report proposes an international agreement to prevent the premature development of ASI until AI development can proceed without these risks. The agreement halts dangerous AI capabilities advancement while preserving access to current, safe AI applications. The proposed framework centers on a coalition led by the United States and China that would restrict the scale of AI training and dangerous AI research. Due to the lack of trust between parties, verification is a key part of the agreement. Limits on the scale of AI training are operationalized by FLOP thresholds and verified through the tracking of AI chips and verification of chip use. Dangerous AI research--that which advances toward artificial superintelligence or endangers the agreement's verifiability--is stopped via legal prohibitions and multifaceted verification. We believe the proposal would be technically sufficient to forestall the development of ASI if implemented today, but advancements in AI capabilities or development methods could hurt its efficacy. Additionally, there does not yet exist the political will to put such an agreement in place. Despite these challenges, we hope this agreement can provide direction for AI governance research and policy.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Nov 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Detecting Hidden ML Training With Zero-Overhead Telemetrycited by 4
- 2026Zero knowledge verification for frontier AI training is possiblecited by 2
- 2026Does Distributed Training Undermine Compute Governance?cited by 0
- 2026International Agreements to Limit Frontier AI: Objectives and Exitcited by 0
- 2026The Closing Window: How Governments Could Lose Their Ability to Restrain Advanced AIcited by 0
- 2026The Closing Window: How Governments Could Lose Their Ability to Restrain Advanced AI26 Jun 2026
- 2026International Agreements to Limit Frontier AI: Objectives and Exit19 Jun 2026
- 2026Detecting Hidden ML Training With Zero-Overhead Telemetry17 Jun 2026
- 2026Zero knowledge verification for frontier AI training is possible3 Jun 2026
- 2026Does Distributed Training Undermine Compute Governance?28 May 2026