mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Continual Learning of Domain Knowledge from Human Feedback in Text-to-SQL

arXiv 2511.10674 ↗First posted 10 Nov 2025cs.CL cs.AI cs.DBcited by 1

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate SQL queries from natural language questions but struggle with database-specific schemas and tacit domain knowledge. We introduce a framework for continual learning from human feedback in text-to-SQL, where a learning agent receives natural language feedback to refine queries and distills the revealed knowledge for reuse on future tasks. This distilled knowledge is stored in a structured memory, enabling the agent to improve execution accuracy over time. We design and evaluate multiple variations of a learning agent architecture that vary in how they capture and retrieve past experiences. Experiments on the BIRD benchmark Dev set show that memory-augmented agents, particularly the Procedural Agent, achieve significant accuracy gains and error reduction by leveraging human-in-the-loop feedback. Our results highlight the importance of transforming tacit human expertise into reusable knowledge, paving the way for more adaptive, domain-aware text-to-SQL systems that continually learn from a human-in-the-loop.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Process reward models for reasoning, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2025.

Builds on

12 of 19 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
  2. 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
  3. 2023MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQLcited by 164
  4. 2024CHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQLcited by 138
  5. 2024MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generationcited by 105
  6. 2023Coverage-based Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 59
  7. 2025Contextual Experience Replay for Self-Improvement of Language Agentscited by 48
  8. 2025XiYan-SQL: A Novel Multi-Generator Framework For Text-to-SQLcited by 40
  9. 2025Automatic Metadata Extraction for Text-to-SQLcited by 27
  10. 2023Interactive Text-to-SQL Generation via Editable Step-by-Step Explanationscited by 19
  11. 2022Learn from Yesterday: A Semi-Supervised Continual Learning Method for Supervision-Limited Text-to-SQL Task Streamscited by 7
  12. 2024Leveraging Prior Experience: An Expandable Auxiliary Knowledge Base for Text-to-SQLcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026AgentSM: Semantic Memory for Agentic Text-to-SQL
  2. 2025MTSQL-R1: Towards Long-Horizon Multi-Turn Text-to-SQL via Agentic Training
  3. 2025MARS-SQL: A multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for Text-to-SQL
  4. 2024PET-SQL: A Prompt-Enhanced Two-Round Refinement of Text-to-SQL with Cross-consistency
  5. 2026Human-Level Text-to-SQL via Reinforcement Learning on Verified Data, Without Pipeline Engineering
  6. 2025RAISE: Reasoning Agent for Interactive SQL Exploration
  7. 2025Arctic-Text2SQL-R1: Simple Rewards, Strong Reasoning in Text-to-SQL
  8. 2026Integrating Reasoning and Generalization in Text-to-SQL via Self-Enhanced Fine-Tuning