LiteraryTaste: A Preference Dataset for Creative Writing Personalization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
People have different creative writing preferences, and large language models (LLMs) for these tasks can benefit from adapting to each user's preferences. However, these models are often trained over a dataset that considers varying personal tastes as a monolith. To facilitate developing personalized creative writing LLMs, we introduce LiteraryTaste, a dataset of reading preferences from 60 people, where each person: 1) self-reported their reading habits and tastes (stated preference), and 2) annotated their preferences over 100 pairs of short creative writing texts (revealed preference). With our dataset, we found that: 1) people diverge on creative writing preferences, 2) finetuning a transformer encoder could achieve 75.8% and 67.7% accuracy when modeling personal and collective revealed preferences, and 3) stated preferences had limited utility in modeling revealed preferences. With an LLM-driven interpretability pipeline, we analyzed how people's preferences vary. We hope our work serves as a cornerstone for personalizing creative writing technologies.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026DRACULA: Hunting for the Actions Users Want Deep Research Agents to Executecited by 1
- 2026(Im)Paired Programming: Coding Agents Improve Productivity but Harm Understandingcited by 1
- 2026Human Label Variation as Stable Signal: Learning Annotator-Specific Explanation Behavior via Cross-Annotator Preference Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026CreativeInstruct: Scalably Teaching LLMs to Balance Quality, Creativity, and Diversitycited by 0
- 2026CreativeInstruct: Scalably Teaching LLMs to Balance Quality, Creativity, and Diversity7 Aug 2026
- 2026(Im)Paired Programming: Coding Agents Improve Productivity but Harm Understanding29 Jul 2026
- 2026Human Label Variation as Stable Signal: Learning Annotator-Specific Explanation Behavior via Cross-Annotator Preference Optimization27 May 2026
- 2026DRACULA: Hunting for the Actions Users Want Deep Research Agents to Execute26 Apr 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Creative Preference Optimization
- 2025Beyond Correctness: Evaluating Subjective Writing Preferences Across Cultures
- 2025LitBench: A Benchmark and Dataset for Reliable Evaluation of Creative Writing
- 2025Curiosity-Driven LLM-as-a-judge for Personalized Creative Judgment
- 2025GRAVITY: A Framework for Personalized Text Generation via Profile-Grounded Synthetic Preferences
- 2026Text as a Universal Interface for Transferable Personalization
- 2024Computational Modeling of Artistic Inspiration: A Framework for Predicting Aesthetic Preferences in Lyrical Lines Using Linguistic and Stylistic Features
- 2025Aligning LLMs by Predicting Preferences from User Writing Samples